Every McDonald’s requires a Ray Kroc

In 1948, Dick and Mac McDonald’s opened a self-service drive-in restaurant. The menu was limited to nine items and service was faster than anyone had seen before. In 1954, Ray Kroc,52, first saw the operations of the McDonald’s restaurant and was fascinated by it. He had an epiphany and started his career in hamburgers by buying worldwide franchise of the restaurant from McDonald brothers; opened his first McDonald’s in 1955 and by 1965 there were 700 McDonald’s. Rest is history that defines the biggest fast-food chain in the world.

McDonald brothers perfected the operation of making and selling fries and hamburgers. Ray Kroc took it global and made McDonald’s a world icon. This is a perfect example of two different set of skills you need, one of a perfectionist to create a perfect operation and another of a visionary to take it global.

Who made McDonald’s “McDonald’s”? Ray Kroc.

It was Ray Kroc who picked it up from one store in a town in California, believed in the concept, set a perfect system to replicate the operations, built a team of great people and set McDonald’s as a world renowned brand. Without the vision, passion and risk taking ability of a Ray Kroc, McDonald’s would have been a great hamburger and fries joint in San Barnardino, CA just like Thai Tom is in Seattle, WA or Aravind Eye Hospital is in South India.

Both Thai Tom and Aravind Eye Hospital are great examples of a process made perfect by a unit at a certain place. But they are not yet global phenomenon because they don’t have someone with a vision and leadership to adopt them and take them worldwide. They are just like McDonald’s was in 1954, and for them to become “McDonald’s”, all they need is a “Ray Kroc.”

Twitter: the microphone for everyone

From the premier of a country to the layman witnessing an event down the street, everyone has got a voice and the leading way to raise it today is through twitter. Whether you are a celebrity managing a PR disaster or a brand raising product awareness, the best way to do it is by being precise, direct and without filters. This is where twitter comes in play. A 140 word short message that you can send out to the world irrespective of who you are, where you live (almost) and what you want to say (risks exist!). All in all, twitter provides everyone with a microphone to express ones views loud and clear.

One of the main advantages of this form of direct communication is that there is almost nothing lost in translation. The message reaches the audience as you want to send it. The chances of you being quoted out of context are less than ever before and the fact that it is on the web, the golden rule of “web never forgets” applies to your tweets to a large extent. Twitter has been more effective than other sources of information sharing like blogs, podcast and youtube. Reason being twitter is effortless. You can speak your head out and you don’t have to be a writer or photographer to do that.

Indian Premium League, one of the most lucrative sports league in the world, unleashed the power of twitter in one of the best possible examples of how dominating this medium can be. All through the tournament and scandals surrounding it, the role of major Indian newspaper and news channels was limited to quoting the role players from their twitter feeds. No major news conference, no people running with cameras and microphones, but as much, if not more, buzz and fan following, all through twitter.

The word of mouth social campaigns like Malaria No More and relief efforts in Haiti reached new heights with the help of twitter.

Twitter does a great job in leveling the playing field. You no longer have to wait to be reached out to or asked for an opinion. There’s the microphone for you and you got to leverage it to reach out to your “followers”.

Is first mover advantage overrated?

Apple iPod, Microsoft Windows, Toyota cars, Facebook. There’s one thing common among these products. They are all market leaders in their respective categories with substantial market dominance but were not the first movers in their industries. There were hundreds of personal music players before iPod came into picture, Windows was not the first operating system, American cars were dominant when Toyota entered the US market and there were Friendster and MySpace in existence much before Facebook became the social network of choice on Internet. So this pops up an important question: is the first mover advantage overrated?

First movers have a certain advantage. They win the coveted place in the hearts and minds of the early adopters. Early adopters can form a formidable force to help the product cross the chasm, and reach the masses. But the place where the first mover advantage starts to degrade is with the masses. Because the laggards don’t care whether you were first or the last one to enter the market. These are the skeptics, the people who care about the price tag and the popular thing, the advertisements and the buzz.

How can a first mover use the advantage and sustain it? Some ways to do that is by out innovating the competition, maintaining the price advantage and keeping up with the buzz in the industry. Another thing that can play a critical role is the ecosystem around the product. Ecosystem is powerful. It gives you the edge you need to fend the competition, attract the masses and attain the leadership position.

The takeaway from this is if you are trying to decide whether you should enter a particular industry or not, and the no-go decision is based on the fact that there is an existing dominant player in the industry, think again and try to recall one of these products. Then do your due diligence, look for opportunities, ways to improve over existing competition, possibility of an ecosystem and make your decision.

State of denial

Most human beings have a habit to live in the state of denial. Businesses take it a step further…go on record with their denial and then deny that they were ever in state of denial, sometimes decades later. We can describe this as the human touch of doing business. American car companies were in state of denial when Japanese started exporting cars, Sears rubbished Walmart, Yahoo! and Microsoft were in state of denial when Google was growing and Sony et al ignored the shiny white thing Steve Jobs introduced. The list can go on and on.

Any individual caring about his or her PR today cannot ignore twitter. Denouncing twitter as intrusive or waste of time is perfect symptoms of being in state of denial. Along the same lines, businesses cannot ignore the growing importance of social media. Your company is out there. You can remain in the state of denial and let it bounce like an orphan, or leverage the power of social media and reach your target audience where they want to talk about you.

We need to get out of this state of denial. The best way to do this is by relying on facts. Trust facts. Look at facts as they are, don’t try to decode them your way. Believe in numbers. Numbers generally don’t lie unless you want them to. The idea is to be adaptive to the world around us. Change is constant, we need to move forward by leveraging the change. It would be foolish to suggest against doing due diligence and getting randomized with every activity out there, but do your research with an impartial mind to reach to an answer, not to validate the theory you conceived while denying the facts. The sooner we come out of the state of denial, the better off we are as compared to the people who are still living in it!

Verb-ization

Googling, tweeting are parts of our everyday vocabulary. Netflixing and kindling are not! So here’s a million dollar question: what takes it for your brand to be used as a verb? Brand becoming a verb is immensely powerful. The most important thing being it gains top of the mind brand positioning. Think of search engine and Google comes to mind or think of spreadsheet and Excel strikes you instantaneously.

One argument on what takes for a brand to be verb-ized is that the name should have the potential to verb up. That’s true in some sense. A better way to put this would be if verb-ed up, the name should not have a preexisting meaning (like kindling or living in case of Kindle and Live search respectively). But more important things that play a role here are the widespread use of the product (of the same brand), superiority of the offering and the viral effect. When you keep using the same product again and again, and it is superior enough to dominate the product category, it becomes easier to be used as a verb. Viral effect does play a big role as well. It becomes easier to be used as a verb if the people you are talking to know what it means. Like it makes more sense when you ask someone to xerox it for you and you get a photocopy done.

But then verb-ization can sometimes be a double-edged sword. How often have you bought a HP machine and xeroxed on it? Xerox became so integrated in human vocabulary that sometimes it doesn’t strike us that Xerox is in fact a brand, which is definitely not ideal for Xerox. It takes a lot of toll to build a brand, and while it’s a dream for every company to take their brand to the point of verb-ization, it is important to make sure that the brand doesn’t become too generic to lose its identity. It would be really destructive for Google, the product, if people starts googling on Bing to make their next purchase or plan their next vacation!

P.S. Thanks to Nandeeta Seth, Rafat Sarosh, Miles Witherspoon and Shailesh Shah for their inputs.

It starts with the shoe

Once upon a time, a business school graduate started selling Japanese track and field shoes from the trunk of his car. In a couple of years, the business became profitable enough to open a retail store. Then he started manufacturing his own line of branded shoes for track and field athletes. After mastering the shoe business, he introduced a line of sportswear for this sport. And in a couple of decades since inception, became the behemoth in the sportswear and equipment industry.

This is Phil Knight’s story and the building of Nike!

What is special about Nike is the strategy of returning to its roots in whichever sport it chooses to enter. Nike understands that what they do best is manufacture a pair of shoes. It started with track and field shoes and went on to design apparel and accessories for athletes in this sport. Then when they chose to move to some other sport like football, they first  started with making shoes for the football players. Their expertise in shoe designing and manufacturing helped them build loyalty in the football playing community. After establishing the brand, it made the entire ecosystem for the players of the sport from headbands to socks to the ball itself. Similar cycle went on to continue in each sport.

The idea is to embrace your roots to set a foot in the door and then build an ecosystem around it to grow in the industry. You got to choose what you are best at doing and exploit that core competency when you are going for extensions. If that’s something you present to a new set of customers, chances are they are going to love it. It will be comparatively much easier for you to enter this new market as well as launch other branded products in the market. To put it simply, identify what’s the shoe for your business and start with it.

Will Top 40 level the playing field?

With iPhone App Store having close to 100,000 applications, the most intriguing question is that can any other platform match the enormous ecosystem advantage iPhone has through these applications? On the flip side, top 40 applications in iPhone are really what 90% of people care about. So will Android, BlackBerry, Windows Mobile et al level the playing field by getting these top 40 applications on their platform?

Indirect network effect of the applications (apart from the design genius) makes iPhone one of the most wanted gadgets today. It’s the same network effect that gave Windows the edge in personal computing and is working for Facebook in social networks. But one industry difference makes iPhone more vulnerable than Windows in 90s and that is the openness of the competitive platforms. In the smartphone world, all platforms are open for software developers to launch their applications. The developers who wrote applications for iPhone will pretty much write applications for BlackBerry et al if they see traction for these phones and their applications in the market. If the competitive platforms are good enough to rope in the top applications on their platforms, they might be able to bridge the gap.

But then there’s the long tail. You go somewhere, you remember it because that was the place where you found that obscure song you were looking for, a copy of that biography you didn’t find anywhere else, or that phone application which helped you survive in a foreign country. With close to 100,000 applications, you can find almost anything in the iPhone App Store based on your needs at any given time and it will be a while before a competitive platform catch-up on that.

So will top 40 level the playing field? Well it depends. If the tail behind the head is long enough to attract the masses, the company with the long tail can survive the competitive attacks. What is required in this case is to make sure that the customers realize that you have got the long tail. Your communication with your target customer base should focus on, among other things, the long tail.

When you go after everyone…

…you risk to lose the right someone.

The counter argument to this is that volume counts. Well that’s true, but going after everyone, you might end up diluting your brand so much that it doesn’t have value for anyone. You should think if tomorrow you stop existing, will you be missed? If the dilution is enough to court everyone, the likelihood of you being missed is really low. You will set the bar very low for replacement and the possibility of an alternative taking your place will be really high.

On the other hand, if you have a strong connection with a right set of some passionate followers, you will be missed, missed enough for them to try hard and keep you in business. And when the time is right to grow, you will have these right someone pushing hard to help you cross the chasm and reach mainstream.

Harley Davidson, Ikea, Red Bull and Whole Foods are some well-known examples of the companies that chose to go for the right someone, who became their brand ambassadors. They care about the brand, make worthwhile contribution to it, and above everything else, help spread the word. What these brands got is invaluable and unmatched. They got a dedicated team of mavens who go out there and speak on their behalf to everyone they can, and when they do the talking, it’s more credible than anyone the brand hires to do the same.

Customer service can be the differentiator

Yesterday at 4pm my laptop adapter died. I called Lenovo customer service, my call was answered with a less than 2 minutes of wait time, the issue was diagnosed in less than 10 minutes and a replacement request was placed. Next morning at 10 am I had the UPS guy at my door to deliver a new adapter. After having my share of horrible customer service experiences over time, this experience with Lenovo just wow-ed me.

All laptops are made in China, probably in similar, if not the same, manufacturing facilities. Price as the differentiator is out because they are all pretty much equally priced. All run the same programs. So how do you differentiate one from the other? That’s where customer service comes into picture. You can put life into seemingly commoditized industry with the help of customer service.

This must make you wonder why I am making such a big deal of customer service which I should generally expect to get. It’s partly due to the deteriorating condition of customer service across the board. So when someone like me gets good customer service somewhere, we talk about it and let people know.

I like to draw analogy between customer service and design. Imagine you keep seeing badly designed personal music players one after the other and then you suddenly come across one that is very intuitive, easy to use and fun to carry, or in other words, just great design at work. You notice it and you mention it to others. Same thing happens with customer service and whether it’s Lenovo or Asiana airlines or Zappos, all of them get good amount of mentions, courtesy of their customer service.

To bring this analogy to closure, here’s the flip side. You keep coming across well designed personal music players one after the other and suddenly you come across one that is not up to the mark. In that case, you will notice that bad design and start drawing comparisons with the good ones around. Similarly in case of customer service, if your entire industry is providing better service than you are, you can be in lot of trouble.

Customer service can make a lot of difference and influence a buying decision. So irrespective of what business you are it, make sure you don’t mess with customer service.

Don’t sell, solve

Why do you buy anything? You buy a bottle of water because you are thirsty, you buy an iPod to carry your music around, you buy a luxury car to trade up. The list can go on and on. The basic idea behind buying anything is to solve a problem. This sounds so simple. Then why is anyone trying to sell anything? Why do we have sales people? What we need is a bunch of problem solvers trying to find solutions for our problems.

Put it in other words, the objective of sales team should be to find how a product can solve a customer’s problem. A customer is not going to buy a new suite of software just because it’s a new year and your product version should match the year you are living in nor are they going to choose your brand over the one they are already accustomed to just because you asked them to do so. You got to have a legitimate reason and the best reason is to make customers realize that you are solving a problem that is not solved by the current status quo.

McDonald’s may have a shot against Starbucks because they are solving a customer’s pain of making two stops to get breakfast and coffee and replacing it with a single stop.  Prius might win the race against traditional cars because it reduces the monthly spend by customers on gas. Xbox got an upper hand over PlayStation because Xbox Live enables people to play together and Netflix won over Blockbuster because it removed the trouble of going to the local rental store to rent a movie.

While developing a product and marketing it, it is important for you to think about the problem you are solving. When you understand the problem and try to solve it, your job is done. Selling will be a side effect which will happen during this process.