Category Archives: Technology

How to KISS

So now that we know KISS is easier said than done, it’s time to take a stab at the more important question: how to strike the appropriate level of simplicity? I believe there are two ways to get it right to a large extent. First is by creating a facade. A lot of simplicity can be obtained by creating a mask to hide the details. A customer does not need to deal with the inner functioning of your system. There is a big difference between knowing the inner functioning exists and dealing with it. Driver of a BMW knows that a great deal of engineering excellence goes in developing that engine for the car, but need not have to deal with it. Knowing that makes them pay for it, and not dealing with that makes it easier for them to use it. Similarly, if you are dealing with marketers in search of sophistication, you need to make sure you explain the system and the wealth of engineering sophistication working behind it, and as a special treat to them, they have got a simple personalized interface to deal with it.

This brings us to the second point – personalization. Having personalization as a required feature in your product or service can make even a highly complex product get the traits of simplicity. You want to serve every customer out there and extend the reach of your product. But every customer does not want everything you have to offer. The customer should know that you have all the check-boxes checked when they are choosing between offerings, but they do have a specific set of requirements that need to be fulfilled at this time. Cater your product to meet those needs. Think of Amazon as an example. Amazon has more than 50 stores selling things varying from books and electronics to bags and shoes. But they personalize the website with focus and recommendations based on your needs and past shopping experience. In a very similar fashion, you got to personalize your offering to meet the needs of the customers and make it easier for them to discover the supplemental offerings if they ever have a need for it.

KISS

KISS – Keep It Simple, Stupid –  is easier said than done. It is ironical that to keep something simple is not that simple to do. Though KISS is a software development principle which states that design simplicity should be a key goal and unnecessary complexity should be avoided, it can pretty much be applied to any business in almost any field. 

What comes in way of KISS? I think it is the urge to do it all. We want to do everything and serve everyone. We don’t want to miss a single customer. We keep adding features till our product or service is complex enough to need a simple list of instructions to explain how to traverse through the maze, and often times in the process throw simplicity out of the door.

I believe checkbox features play an equally significant role in killing simplicity. These are the features you got to have to make sure you match your offering with your competitors’. This is something like a necessary evil to retain and attract customers, but the way we do it sometimes kills the simplicity of the offering. 

Another thing that prevents from keeping something simple is the notion of value that thing provides. A general understanding is that the amount of sophistication is directly proportional to the amount you can charge for it. We embrace sophistication. Marketers love the idea of sophistication. Well if something is this simple, why do you expect me to pay so much for it? So we take the easy route, make it look more complex than it’s got to be and attain the goal.

The list of reasons and excuses can go on and on. In a nutshell, KISS is easier said than done!

Kindle must have…

1) Blog feeds: Blogs have become mainstream source of information for everything from news to articles. Many people read tens of blog posts a day and something like a book a month making blogs a must have on an electronic reading device. Amazon can develop a web-based blog reader which will remain in-sync with the feeds on Kindle. Having blog feeds in Kindle will also provide an opportunity for Amazon to monetize through contextual ads next to the blogs.

2) Chat client: There’s no question about the importance of community around a product. Having a Kindle-to-Kindle chatting client will allow book clubs to use Kindle as their primary device of communication. People will be able to discuss sections of a book, send around bookmarks and do so much more if they can communicate from right “inside” the book.

3) “Serial” book: Kindle digitizes the books. So an interesting feature for Kindle will be to have a “serial” book, i.e. get an installment of the book every week. Wouldn’t it be great to get a chapter of the new novel from your favorite writer every week way before the novel is out for publishing? The excitement of this for die-hard followers of an author will be just like that of a 24 fanatic watching Jack Bauer traversing through an hour a week in 24.

Technically, all these features are possible. Kindle’s got a wireless connection that enable users read daily newspapers on it. It’s got a full qwerty keyboard for people to search books and browse through Wikipedia. It’s true that none of these features will do an Oprah for Kindle, but they will definitely make Kindle more wannable and pull some customers towards it!

Google’s marketing genius

Since writing the post on marketing starts at inception a few days back, I had a discussion with a few folks on whether Google is run by marketers or not. Well I believe Google has been one of the best marketing companies online and it asserts that marketing needs to be ingrained in every part of the company right from the product and design to community and customer connection.

The entire marketing effort of Google was focused on the early adopters. Google’s target customer base became the savvy Internet users who were continuously in search of information on the web. This created a strong community of mavens which served to increase the marketing strength of Google to spread it all over the web and helped it cross the chasm. 

Simplicity was another feature that differentiated Google from its competition. Google marketed itself to the customers who were not looking for organized content, but were looking for a way to get a list of all content on the Internet in an organized fashion. The success of Google Search engine is dependent on how quickly a customer leaves Google and reaches to the information they are looking for. Google created brand equity and gained customer confidence by not tampering the search results with sponsored results. Instead they clearly marked the sponsored links which became their main source of revenue.

And then there was “Don’t be evil”. I believe it was arguably one of the best principle statements on the Internet (or maybe technology industry) which also served its purpose in marketing the company. Google attracted that big community of users who were looking for alternatives to existing behemoths.

It’s important to understand that great marketing is not an alternate to great product. You got to have great products to succeed in the long run. In fact, a great product is made better and is able to reach the majority if there is great marketing behind it. Google is a perfect example of that!

Chrome: a big win for Google

For a company dominating the web and challenging everything on the desktop with a cheaper web-based alternative, a web browser is an obvious offering. So there came Google Chrome, accompanied with mixed reviews from the technology world. Some people liked it being light weight, flexible between tabs and windows, organized etc., while others hated the missing home page and claimed that it has nothing path breaking as compared to other web browsers available in the market. No matter what your personal viewpoint is on Chrome, in the short term, it is a big win for Google. Why?

Google has set itself as the launch pad on the Internet. The Google’s advertising programs control the major chunk of advertising investment on the web. So basically the better the experience customers have online, better it is for Google. The single most important goal for Google is to bring more and more people online and provide them great web experience. Now even a mediocre Chrome at this time generated enough competition in the market to improve other web browsers even more and make the customer experience much better than what it has ever been. No matter which browser people end up using, if they spend more time on the Internet, it will help Google get stronger and more profitable than anyone else.

With the growing emphasis on cloud and web-based applications, it is hard to imagine how the browsers will look like a couple of years from now. In the long term, it is quite possible that the company that wins the browser battle will have an upper hand in controlling the use of applications hosted in the cloud, but in the short term, improvement in any web browser is a win for Google.

The primary customer

Recently while brainstorming an idea, we tried to find out who our competitors are and what our differentiating factor is. Our differentiating factor boiled down to the fact that most of our biggest competitors in the field are targeting someone else as their primary customer, changing the entire design of their offerings. And as expected, our biggest fear becomes the competitor which is targeting the same primary customer base as we are planning to go after. To identify the primary customer base, and strategize the product around it is as important as anything else in a business.

Consider two blogging platforms as an example. I use WordPress to blog. WordPress provides bloggers a great set of tools to make blogging easy. A decent editor, excellent reports about the readership of the blog and great way to customize the blog makes WordPress an attractive choice for bloggers. The bloggers are the primary customers of WordPress, and WordPress focuses its resources towards their needs.

On the other hand, consider some other platform that provides a whole lot of services along with blogging, but with no special tools to help bloggers. For that platform, bloggers are not the primary customers. The primary customers may be social networkers, communicators or for that matter anyone else, and they might be serving them with excellence. The important thing is to have one and to know who that is. There’s nothing wrong in offering secondary services to your primary customer base because that might serve some of their needs and help you retain them. 

The point to note here is, you must know your primary customer base and work to serve their basic requirements first. I believe having a niche as the primary customer base to start with will increase your chances of being successful. Reason being you will have a really focused group and you will know where to allocate the resources…after all, great strategy is all about allocating the resources in the right way.

A day without Internet

So finally after long time I recently had a really productive day (working). A day working on my laptop, without Internet connection. And guess what, no emails, no checking of news or stock quotes, no Facebook, no blog surfing and no YouTube. During this time, I got 80 emails in my inbox, a couple of big news in my Facebook newsfeed, my unread blogroll went to an all time high, Microsoft stock touched a new bottom and Dow Jones…well let’s not talk about it.

As much as all these – staying connected, getting news, social networking – are necessary, it consumes a lot of time which on a non-connected day can be used doing something else. This is a typical example of technology being a necessary evil.

It’s not just Internet, there are many things – otherwise known as technological blessings – that fall in the same category. Take cell phone as an example. I have a few hundred contacts and their phone numbers in this device. How many phone numbers do I remember? Less than five of them. It is great that I can reach any of my contacts in a click, but losing my cell phone can be a really frustrating experience (I better take a back-up).

This day without Internet connection also made me think about technological dependence from another perspective. Every technological advancement creates new human dependencies on the technology. Eventually it becomes a necessary part of our lives which we – by default – expect to have. The importance of that thing is realized on the day we are without it.

So here’s an experiment: think of one thing that you by default expect to have all the time. Live for a day without it. You will definitely appreciate having it more than ever before!

Dell and Apple

Here’s another installment of the strategy series: Dell and Apple.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based solely on the strategy discussion in Jack Welch’s Winning.

Two companies that are pioneers in selling computers and other electronic items in the world have completely opposite strategies. Dell, with its online store and customization engine, makes buying a computer all about how much memory, hard disk and USB slots you need on your computer. Apple on the other hand sells you much more than a computer or personal music system iPod. It sells an experience primarily through those wonderfully designed Apple stores. Unlike Dell, Apple provides customer with more pre-customized boxed options as compared to customizing that box (Apple computers are customizable as well at Apple.com).

If we look at Dell’s model of selling computers, what Dell is doing is selling an assembled box of all the different parts that makes a computer. Customize-ability of the computer plays a big role and design takes a back seat. The distinguishing factor is pretty much the price and support. Dell’s strategy, in simple words, is to commoditize the computers. Make buying computers as simple as buying any other home or office supplies. The strategy works great with corporate customers who care more about price and support.

Apple does not sell computers, it sells an experience, a membership to an exclusive cult and an entry to the Apple product ecosystem. Design plays the central role in all Apple products. Apple’s strategy, opposite to Dell, can be stated in simple words as de-commoditization of all the products it sells. As in any typical case of de-commoditization, price takes a back seat and customers get attracted to the product itself. Apple’s strategy is crisp and clear, and Apple implements it with perfection in any industry it enters, be it the computer industry, music industry or mobile phone industry.

These are two companies selling the same things with completely different strategies and execution plans. The debate will go on for ever on which company has a better strategy, but the success of Dell and Apple asserts the point that there’s no one strategy that is good or bad for your company. Your success depends on how crisp the strategy is and how well you are implementing it.

Why not standardize?

I recently bought a new laptop, a Lenovo T61, at work. At home, I use HP Pavilion zv5000. Thanks to software supremacy, starting to work on a new laptop is normally a pretty smooth and easy process with a negligible learning curve. But it just happened that Lenovo and HP for some reason decided to switch the places of control key and function key on their laptops, i.e. where HP decided to out the control key, Lenovo decided to put the function key and vice versa. Along with that, the two keyboards have different placement of almost all keys other than the letters and numbers on the QWERTY keyboard. These different placement of keys on the keyboard has made working on these two laptops considerably frustrating.

There must be some really good reason for these companies to design their laptop keyboards and key placements as they did. Each one of them must have spent in millions to research and develop the best possible key placement. The important thing to notice is, normally we never buy a laptop because we like the key placement on the keyboard of the laptop. There are half a dozen other differentiating factors we consider before buying a laptop like price, battery life, size, weight and so on. So why not standardize this relatively unnoticed thing and make the end user’s life easier?

Interestingly, the same thing happened with me when I switched my cell phone from HTC Dash to MOTO Q. Though the frustration here was considerably less because I don’t use the keyboard that often and I made a switch rather than trying to use both everyday, but the same argument makes sense here as well (till we are not on all touch phones), why not standardize?

It’s the kind of eyeballs that matters

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
100 people watch a sports broadcast on television. During a timeout, an advertisement appears on the screen. Out of 100, 20 people are really target audience for this advertisement. So what matters to the advertiser? The fact that the viewership of the broadcast is 100 or that the number of target audience it is reaching is 20?

It’s the kind of eyeballs that counts 9 out of 10 times (I say 9 out of 10 times, because there are one-off cases like a Superbowl ad or times square banner ad where you are just trying to build the brand recognition). That’s the secret behind the success of search advertising because here you are reaching the right kind of audience. Advertising that targets one customer at a time based on any criteria, be it mobile phone advertising targeted based on location and time of day to an individual, or advertisement next to a web email based on what conversation a person is in, or search advertising where the audience is really trying to look for something, is more effective than the mass advertising because of the same reason. The advertiser knows that every pair of eyeballs they are reaching to are the ones that matter.

How to find out which audience matter? Couple of ways: first, profile characteristics of the audience and second, activity of the audience. Linking this information to the advertisement can provide right targeting. Let’s look at a couple of examples to make more sense here. On the Internet, if you can find that I am a person living in Seattle (City from IP address: a profile characteristic) and a Jerry Seinfeld fan (I searched for Seinfeld videos: activity), an advertisement selling DVD of Seinfeld sitcom might make more sense to me. Or, on a mobile phone, if you know that I am currently in New York City (mobile signal: a profile characteristic) and texting friends to ask for dinner (text message: activity), an advertisement selling specials at a restaurants in the vicinity will be the most attractive to me.