Category Archives: Technology

Impact of technology

I wrote this post about four years back while doing my MBA at Columbia Business School. For some reason (don’t remember why), didn’t publish it. So putting it out now.

This week reinforced my belief in the reach and impact of technology. It’s across industries and continents. It spans different walks of life and touches people in different ways. But the common element is that it has more impact than ever before. Here’s a recap of four events/cases this week shed light on how technology is playing a critical role in various industries.

Paul Calello, CEO of Credit Suisse investment banking division gave a talk on leadership and state of financial markets. He was asked what is the next big thing that will influence the market. His one word answer was technology. He went on to explain how technology can increase transparency, make it more practical to put forth checks in place and help make better decisions than ever before.

In supply chain management class, the case study for the week was Zara success story. One sentence reasoning behind Zara’s success is its heavy investments in information technology and automated infrastructure. The amazing infrastructure Zara has put in place to have a rapid inventory update every six weeks (less than half the time taken by a typical competitor in the space) is heavily dependent on connectivity and automation in supply chain management.

Next was a simulations exercise for Statistics class to find out a bond which is more profitable and less risky than a bunch of specified stocks. In other words, statistical regression using computing power to solve an otherwise a complex looking problem.

Lastly, a talk on Google’s impact on creating the massive digital library. Very interesting to see two contradicting sides of impact technology was having on an industry. On the brighter side, the knowledge was going to be universally available to anyone interested in leveraging it. On the darker side, activities like piracy will grow and the revenue hit on publishers will in turn have an impact on authors motivation.

I have always been a believer in technology and its power. I strongly believe in the idea that it’s the application of technology in innovative ways that is going to have a lasting impact for many years to come.

Hilton, Marriott, Four Seasons are most ‘relevant’ hotel brands

How do you choose a hotel? By the quality of service? The view? What your friends might think? How about the water pressure in the shower? Don’t laugh.

Brodeur Partners looked into the heart of what really matters when it comes to online conversation about hotel choice and has come up with intriguing answers. “We wanted to go beyond speculation and opinion, and really see what drives online behavior – in this case, conversation – around different hotel brands,” said Brodeur Partners CEO Andy Coville.

The study reveals that Hilton, Marriott, and Four Seasons (in that order) have the highest Conversational Relevance™ in online discussions among leisure and business travelers. The conclusion is based on an analysis by Brodeur Partners and MavenMagnet of what is “relevant” in online brand conversation.

The Conversational Relevance™ scale is a measure of how much people are talking about a brand and how impactful and positive that conversation is. Brodeur and MavenMagnet parsed more than 18,000 online conversations between May 2012 and October 2012 across social networks, profiles, forums, news websites and blogs.

“We looked not only at practical considerations but at how the brands resonated with hotel guests’ senses, values and social needs, which are the other dimensions of Brodeur’s relevance model,” said Jerry Johnson, Brodeur executive vice president of strategic planning. “When a brand is engaging all four dimensions, it inspires strong feelings and an abiding loyalty in those who experience it.”

“Using our proprietary technology, we tap into the collective intellect of engaged consumers—in this case, consumers sharing their experience about travel and hotels,” said Aditya Ghuwalewala, MavenMagnet founder. “Our zero interference approach eliminates the risk of respondent conditioning thereby delivering actual insights focusing on what’s relevant in the space.”

Four Elements that Drive Relevance

The top hotel brands in the analysis displayed highly positive overall Conversational Relevance™ scores based on positive/negative buzz differential, with Hilton earning a 58 percent score followed by Marriott (56 percent) and Four Seasons(51 percent).

The analysis dug much deeper, however, looking at each of the 10 brands’ attributes through Brodeur’s four relevance pathways:

  • Functional – Practical attributes people care about like service, location, rooms, recreation and rewards programs. Comments in this area dominated the conversation about hotels. MarriottHilton and Sheraton were the winners here.
  • Sensory – Attributes that appeal to all five senses like the view and water pressure in the shower (which surprisingly eclipses bed comfort in online attention).
    Ritz-Carlton and Hilton led the category.
  • Values – Attributes that reflect personal values such as the hotel’s service ethic and commitment to indulging patrons. Four Seasons dominated.
  • Social – Attributes related to customer status, such as the brand’s cachet. Four Seasons dominated here, too.

The analysis further broke down results between leisure and business travelers. Room cleanliness, for example, means more to business travelers than leisure travelers. It’s the other way around for recreation.

Leisure travelers were broken down further still, between those traveling with children and those without. The Ritz-Carlton was particularly popular in conversations in the former category, and recreation was paramount for families.

Key findings
The Conversational Relevance analysis was able to specifically identify strengths that some brands could leverage and weaknesses that held other brands back. In addition, it identified a framework that all hotels can use in managing their online and social communications:

  • Service and location are the biggest “functional” conversation drivers.
  • Accessibility – both to the hotel and nearby amenities – drives nearly two-thirds of online conversations about the “functional” attributes of a hotel.
  • When it comes to conversations about rooms, size matters, closely followed byconnectivity and technology.
  • While there has been a lot of investment by hotels in the quality of beds, the subject that most people talked about in the “touch” or “feel” category was the shower, specifically thewater pressure of the shower.
  • Room noise was a hot topic in the “sound” category, particularly among family travelers. Most of that conversation was negative.
  • People talked about the “values” of a brand in terms of what kind of service they received, i.e., having a “service first” culture and being responsive. A particularly important element that drove online conversation was a hotel staff’s responsiveness and personal attention to individual needs.
  • The biggest driver of social conversations is whether a hotel is “referenceable” – that is, something travelers would recommend to others.
  • That a hotel’s “luxury” or “indulgence” is a symbol of status and achievement drove a considerable amount of conversation among business and leisure travelers; however one-third of that discussion was negative.
  • By far the biggest driver of conversation among business travelers is whether a hotel is considered “best in class.” Social relevance for leisure travelers derives more from peer reviews.

Why Conversational Relevance?
This study on the hotel industry is the first demonstration of Brodeur’s new Conversational Relevance model. Applicable to any industry, organization, brand, person, idea, candidate or cause, the Conversational Relevance methodology measures buzz volume, impact and positivity/negativity across four relevance dimensions. At the same time, it identifies hot topics, positive and negative, uncovering hidden strengths on which to build a business and risks that could devolve into crises.

The Conversational Relevance methodology has a number of advantages:

  • It relies on real people freely sharing thoughts with others who have common interests about things that matter to them.
  • Since it finds conversations where they occur, there’s no location bias.
  • It’s devoid of any response bias that could occur through a survey questionnaire.

“Our relevance strategy is founded on the principle that creating a dominant, relevant brand is as much a science as an art,” said Coville. “Relevance can be quantified and, more importantly, systematically improved to support behavior change in the people you’re hoping to influence. Conversational Relevance is just one of our many services that deliver on this principle.”

For more information on Conversational Relevance and hospitality, visit http://www.mavenmagnet.com/Articles/MAVENMAGNET_Hospitality-Relevance-Audit-2.14.13.pdf

Netflix got it, you can have it and more!

In one word: information.

Netflix has got something that can help them develop better originals than most others content producers. Netflix knows what people are watching, how many times they are watching, which episode cliffhangers are most captivating and where are the audience dropping out. This is unparalleled information that can be put to use to develop more targeted programs and improve the content (provided the creatives listen to them). The interesting thing is that they can learn not only from their shows but also from shows of other channels for which they buy syndication rights. The information source is not a focus group of 15 people or a survey of 1500 individuals, it’s information they are getting from hundreds of thousands of consumers feeding it on a continuous and ongoing basis.

Same is true for the likes of Hulu and HBO (with its HBO GO) kind of services where you have a two-way connection with the audience. Online stores like Amazon and Zappos have the same edge when it comes to goods. They track every step of consumer to know what they are buying, what they are not buying and much more. But for the rest of the world where there’s only one way connection with the audience or consumer, you lack this information. The void can be filled with the help of information on social media.

Social media takes edge away from these distributors to a large extent. You can get the same information for your content or product by listening to the consumer on social media. The reason being we human beings like to talk. We like to share our thoughts, feelings, opinions and a lot more. Social media has provided everyone a great place to do that with the rest of the world. By analyzing this amazing database of information, you can learn anything from what they are liking about your content or product and what they are not.

But you get something more that the Netflixes of the world do not get from their power of connectivity. You get the reason behind a particular action. By using the right technology and techniques, the information on social media can be analyzed and you can be provided with not just what, but also the why.

In a nutshell, whether you fall under the bracket of Netflixes of the world or not, you got to leverage right technology and techniques to analyze the information online and use it to make better products for your customers.

Degrees of likeness

Social media has taken the ease of expressing oneself to a whole new level. People express their opinion on everything from an everyday product to a television show to an event to a movement. Issues are discussed, recommendations are made and reviews are shared to make this world more connected than ever before. This provides a whole new challenge to measure and learn about what the opinion flow is from a market research perspective.

Lets talk about an interesting question of “how much”. The point is simple, do you like something enough to go for it? Or on the other hand, do you despise something so much that you will recommend against it? You might like a product, but not enough to buy it. Or in a more interesting case, in deciding whether to see a movie or not, you might dislike the actor, but like the plot enough to sit through it for a couple of hours.

The important thing lies in the sophistication of analysis. You got to understand the difference between people being on the fence or on either side of the fence. But the more important thing is to understand how strongly have people formed their opinion. Metaphorically speaking, how tall is the fence to let people cross from one side to the other. The next step is to figure out the reason behind an opinion and factors that can play a role in impacting that opinion. 

The beauty of market research techniques developed by MavenMagnet is to understand the degree of likeness people have about a certain topic without putting them in a box. This provides us the capability to extract patterns, form key takeaways and make actionable recommendations to help in making critical business decisions. 

Factories in software

Factories form the basis of production industry. Are there factories in the software world?

Factories can be in any industry. Factories essentially puts the required machinery in place and sets a process around it. In case of automobile industry, from cars to airplanes, we call it an assembly line. In case of pharmaceutical industry, there are manufacturing units that convert chemicals to packaged drugs.

In case of software too there are factories. The idea of having factories in this world is to take care of the common processes which are essential in (good) software development. Some processes are inbuilt in the development platform. These assemblies can be included by anyone using that particular platform. Other processes are developed by software engineers to use and reuse their best practices. These processes are activities like error logging, messaging, sending alerts and emails, maintaining connections with databases and so on. Factories in software provide the necessary efficiency and reduces the probability of human error.

The business of prediction

Human beings are obsessed to know the future. What’s going to happen is something that excites people and in some cases helps them make decisions. The business of prediction, what the future holds, is a multi-billion dollar industry. It ranges from predicting the stock price of a company to success of a product launch to opening of a movie to outcome of a match-up.

Big data gives us immense power to more accurately provide indications for the future. The large number of conversations happening online act like an unparalleled source of information. The heart of dealing with big data lies in the analysis of this data. A combination of technological processing and expert observation leads to generating patterns with rich insights and takeaways  that in-turn lead to indications for the future.

MavenMagnet’s primary focus is to identify the reasons behind every takeaway or prediction. The key drivers and barriers defining the success or failure of an entity. The top influencers who are making or breaking a reputation and will play a role in the future. The best steps you can take to prevent a negative tide or ride a positive wave.

Everything apart, if a prediction is not supported with a reason, it’s worthless. If there’s nothing that can help you improve the fortune of your entity or impact what’s going to happen, it makes very little sense. Of course there’s keeping your fingers crossed for a positive surprise…another thing we humans are obsessed with!

Yet another campaign done right

A few months back I wrote about excellence of the New York shuttle S campaign. Here I want to talk about a very similar theme based campaign done on another piece of public transit and its impact (yes, we have numbers to prove that it worked well!)

I am talking about the San Diego trolley theme campaign of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic during the 2012 Comic-Con. The promoters of the show took one car out of 4-5 cars of the trolley and painted it with themes from the TV Show. The impact was amazing because of a couple of reasons. When anyone saw all the cars with simple regular red color and in between a car painted with a particular theme, it instantly caught their attention. People entering the car saw the same theme of the TV show wherever they looked. Second, it was extremely targeted to get hold of the Comic-Con audience who were there to talk and listen about movies and TV shows. The idea was, as always, to get undivided consumer attention.

With hundreds of movies and TV shows trying to buy a few minutes of attention from 130,000 Comic-Con attendees, this campaign of My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic created significant buzz by the attendees and left a lasting impression in their mind. According to a research done by MavenMagnet, My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic ended up being the second most talked about TV show on social media by the Comic-Con attendees!

Check out MavenMagnet report Comic-Con 2012: Movies and TV Shows that dazzled the social world.

Is being ahead of time a good enough excuse?

If you look at two extreme outcomes for an innovative product, it either goes on to revolutionize an industry or is ignored by the consumers till someone who is a better product developer and marketer comes and takes a second look at it. The latter is supported by one of those excuses that people use to justify a failed product in the past when they see a successful one today: well we did it 10 years back, though it was not a big success at that time because we were ahead of time.

A product fails when either you have not done the innovation right or you were not able to market the product right. There are many things that go in innovative product development. For a product to be successful, it should be usable, priced to justify the value and should meet the infrastructure constraints. It should have something significant enough for the consumer to care for it.

Many innovative products play on the front of changing the consumers’ mindset. That’s where marketing enters the picture. Marketing is the most essential thing that defines the success or failure of a product. Every good product that gets successful has a great marketing behind it. Marketing for a product starts at the very inception of the product development process. It brings the consumer lens to the product. Answers the questions like what problem are you solving? Are you supplementing something or complementing something? Are you messaging it correctly to your consumers?

If a product is not up to the mark, it will not survive. Work on getting it right. But if your product is the best thing out there, get the right marketing in place. That will accelerate the time enough so that you are not ahead of time.

Sprint vs. Marathon

Sprint and marathon, the two forms of running requiring very different skills. Both are challenging, both are goal-oriented and both require a whole lot of training. But it’s quite apparent that the two are as different as they can be.

Can a sprinter become a marathon runner? The challenge here is you cannot run a bunch of sprints one after the other and combine them to make a marathon run. It just doesn’t work like that. Couple of core reasons being planning and perseverance. A marathon runner has to plan and run the whole 26 miles. Train for it. Conserve the energy to finish it. Be persistent to continue at several points on the way when the common human instinct is to give up. And the most important thing, for someone who has been a sprinter, is to take the leap and give up sprinting to become a marathon runner.

The same principle of sprint vs. marathon applies to a business. Any start-up is a sprinter’s heaven. You run one sprint after the other. You release one product after the other. You put something out there, test the waters, update it and go for the next thing. A great way to run fast and try different things. But for a start-up to be a viable business, you need to be persistent. If you believe in your product, you got to stick to it to make it better everyday and go the whole way. You need to plan for it, bring the right people on board and keep the ball rolling. In other words, you got to get ready to run the marathon.

Competition and Innovation

Competition is a prerequisite for Innovation. Competition motivates the leader to out innovate and stay ahead in the game. It makes the companies doing the catch-up to think outside the box to beat the leaders. A business lacking competition often stagnates because there is no need to innovate.

There are several examples where competition has led to innovation and lack of competition has led to stagnation in the same industry. The best one that comes to mind is the web browser industry. In mid 90s, the browser industry had fierce competition between Netscape, Microsoft and a few other players. Between 1995 and 2001, both Netscape and Microsoft came out with six versions of their browsers out-innovating each other over and over again with new releases every few months. Eventually Netscape became less relevant and IE captured about 90% of the market. For the next five years starting 2001, there was literally no innovation in the web browser industry till new browsers like Mozilla, Firefox and later Chrome started becoming relevant. It took Microsoft five years to come up with IE7 in 2006. And since then, competition has fueled innovation for the three big players coming out with new features in the browser every few months.

The same dynamics is visible in many spaces, be it video games, cell phones, hybrid cars or social media. There are always lot of other factors in play like macro-economic conditions, state of the broader industry etc., but competition is the driver when it comes to innovation.