Category Archives: Advertising

Targeted Marketing Pillars

Who, What, When, Where and How: the four Ws and H every company needs to cover while developing the marketing plan for a product.

You might have the best software solution for customer relationship management in the world, or for that matter the best baby soap, but till your customer knows it, and believes in it, it’s of no use.

No matter how big or small your marketing budget is, if you are not targeting the right audience with the right message, at the right time and the right place, using the right medium, it is of no use. In the next few posts I will share some thoughts to explore each one of these rights.

Linking ideas to product

If we were playing Jeopardy, the right answer would have been: “What is branding?”

Beijing Olympics 2008 is one of the classical examples of branding at a global scale from the recent times. China spent north of $40 billion to link the idea of progressiveness and development to the country. The infrastructure improvements, the pollution control, the massive ceremonies and the security arrangements apart from a list of other things linked the idea of progressiveness and development to the product known as China.

Similarly, when a company tries to brand a product like face cream, they link the idea of beauty to the product. That sense of beauty is exposed in every bit of the product right from the formula that’s used to develop it to its packaging to the advertisements of the product. Everything together tries to deliver the same message to convince the customers.  

Whether you are branding the most populous country in the world or a face cream or just water, it sums up to the simple process of linking ideas to product (or service). The logo, advertisements and customer service, all have their own roles to play when it comes to branding.

I believe there are two main purposes of branding. First is creating trustworthiness. Trust plays a major role in any decision a customer is making and that is one of the big goals behind branding. The second purpose behind branding is to create a community to back your product. Ideas are not attached by marketers alone, they are attached by consumers as well. And when consumers attach an idea with your product, it speaks much louder than you doing the same. So the goal here is to provide enough buzz and space for the mavens to pick up your product and take it from there to create more trust in the community and build your brand equity.

Going local

The basic idea behind any marketing or advertising effort is to create a connection with the customers. The success of your campaign depends on how well a customer can identify with your product. And when it comes to identifying with a product, connection at a regional level plays a very important role. You can define a region at any level, it can be a country, a state and in some cases, even cities.

Let’s talk about going local in a country. In the world today, you got to consider the global marketplace which is full of diversity. In order to link to their customers in this diverse global market, companies try to adapt their stories to make it compelling for the people in a particular geography. Consider India as an example. In India, there are many global brands which are so well connected to the local community that people end up thinking them to be local brands. Vicks (Procter & Gamble), Maggie noodles (Nestle), Bata footwear, Cadbury Dairy Milk (CadburySchweppes), Lifebuoy soaps (Unilever) and many others fall in this category. The reason being the way these brands have established connection with the people in the country. The product itself is localized in many cases, followed by localized advertisements, packaging, slogans and what not.

But this concept of going local is not limited at the country level. In many states, companies use local branding strategies to connect with the customers. For example, while Ford slogan in most parts of USA is “Ford Built Tough”, in Texas the company goes local with its campaign slogan: “Ford is the best in Texas”. The goal is again very simple: connect with the customers in Texas, and if it can be done better with a local slogan, let’s use that.

I believe when a brand goes for local connection, it generates a much higher level of trustworthiness with the customers. It makes the customers feel important and increases their loyalty towards the brand, in-turn making the local connection work.

It’s the kind of eyeballs that matters

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
100 people watch a sports broadcast on television. During a timeout, an advertisement appears on the screen. Out of 100, 20 people are really target audience for this advertisement. So what matters to the advertiser? The fact that the viewership of the broadcast is 100 or that the number of target audience it is reaching is 20?

It’s the kind of eyeballs that counts 9 out of 10 times (I say 9 out of 10 times, because there are one-off cases like a Superbowl ad or times square banner ad where you are just trying to build the brand recognition). That’s the secret behind the success of search advertising because here you are reaching the right kind of audience. Advertising that targets one customer at a time based on any criteria, be it mobile phone advertising targeted based on location and time of day to an individual, or advertisement next to a web email based on what conversation a person is in, or search advertising where the audience is really trying to look for something, is more effective than the mass advertising because of the same reason. The advertiser knows that every pair of eyeballs they are reaching to are the ones that matter.

How to find out which audience matter? Couple of ways: first, profile characteristics of the audience and second, activity of the audience. Linking this information to the advertisement can provide right targeting. Let’s look at a couple of examples to make more sense here. On the Internet, if you can find that I am a person living in Seattle (City from IP address: a profile characteristic) and a Jerry Seinfeld fan (I searched for Seinfeld videos: activity), an advertisement selling DVD of Seinfeld sitcom might make more sense to me. Or, on a mobile phone, if you know that I am currently in New York City (mobile signal: a profile characteristic) and texting friends to ask for dinner (text message: activity), an advertisement selling specials at a restaurants in the vicinity will be the most attractive to me.

Comcast’s ad loaded TV guide

Basic digital television programming package from Comcast costs about $40. One of the biggest selling points for the digital packages is the ease of navigating between channels using the TV guide, and what Comcast has done with the advertisements in their TV guide is made this thing frustrating and harder to use. (To put things in context here, Comcast has added an advertisement at the bottom of each page of the TV guide. This advertisement is unescapable during channel surfing. The ad is obstructive because it is made part of the scroll, i.e. in the attached picture, if you want to go to channel 63 from 62, you will first have to go through the ad, making the ad every fifth selection in any channel surfing.)  

This is a classic blunder that brings forward a couple of points. First, Comcast is literally repelling its customers using the very customer magnet it used to attract the customers. The customers feel cheated when they have to go through the obstructive ads even after paying an hefty fee to use the digital programming package. Instead of cultivating an ecosystem around the TV guide by making it more usable and likable by the customers, Comcast is prompting its customers to look for alternatives in this fiercely competitive digital television world. The least Comcast should do is make the advertisement non-obstructive during channel surfing.

It is no doubt that this is a great place to put advertisments. In the world of TiVo where customers skip the advertisements all the time, the ad that is unescapable is the one in the TV guide. But Comcast is missing it on the implementation. The best way to implement this ad would be to introduce a new set of “adware” digital programming package. Give the customers an option to select ad powered TV guide at a subsidized rate as compared to the non-ad loaded TV guide. Customers who choose for the ad funded TV guide will accept the ad, and at the same time, this would be a great way for Comcast to increase penetration into the non-digital cable customer base to go for digital television at a subsidized rate.

Is it just another medium?

Newspaper, radio, television and now Internet. People around the world look for mediums for information and entertainment. Looking at the evolution of each of these mediums, it makes sense to ask if this world wide web is just another medium? Well the answer is yes, and no. Yes, because in the end, it is a medium where the customers can get the information and entertainment they are looking for. But then like any other medium, the web has some uniqueness that stand out to make it more than just another medium.

We should consider a few different perspectives while answering this question. Let’s start with the content creators and providers. Internet has revolutionized this field in great ways. The content development on Internet is not something that is controlled by a few big networks. Anyone and everyone can write a blog or upload a video and become a content provider. And since there is no bar on who can become a content provider, the amount of content is infinite, the competition is fierce and the cost is close to zero.

Now let’s look at the monetizing aspect. Advertisements are the main source of revenue on any medium. On Internet, advertisers get a chance to maximize their return by targeting the customers using behavioral or contextual relevance. The interactive nature of Internet and the individual targeting of customers make advertising on the web standout as compared to any other medium.

One more aspect that we got to consider here is the end customer. Internet is more different for end customers as a medium than anyone else because here the customer is the driver. The customer is not bound to read the news printed on the daily newspaper or watch a sitcom at a given time on the television. On the Internet, the customer can pick and choose what they want in terms of information and entertainment, when they want and how they want it.

In the end, what makes the web stand out as a medium is its unique aspects of interactivity, equality, personizability and breath. Another way Internet is more than just another medium is the way it has affected all other mediums, be it newspapers online, where customer can get the latest news live or the television shows on the web, which the customers can watch on demand. For all other mediums, Internet has acted like a supplement to strengthen the customer base, making it really special.

Revenue: reason and source

Reason a customer pays for a product or service offered by a company is in most cases the source of revenue for the company. But then there are cases when this is not true. The reason a customer pays is one thing, which in most cases is the primary offering, but a completely different secondary or additional offering generates more revenue for the company. These are the cases when the reason and source of revenue are different, though mostly interdependent.

One of the most talked about examples in this case is Hertz rental car service. The biggest source of revenue here is the rental insurance that Hertz provide with its cars which is an additional and optional service the company provides when you rent a car from them (just for kicks, the second biggest source of revenue: used car sale). Another example to consider is the wholesale retail chain that loves to play the membership fee ballgame. Customers go to Costco because they like to buy stuff in large packs at a wholesale price. But Costco makes 70% of its operating income through the upfront membership customers pay for to get in the store. Similarly, consider Google. Customers go to Google primarily to search something on the Internet. Their main source of revenue: advertisements, the contextual offerings next to the search results customers are looking for.

It’s interesting to see an auto rental company, a wholesale store, and a search engine, each excelling in the core area of their business but making the biggest chunk of revenue from a secondary offering. The important thing here is to notice their focal point of operations. Hertz cannot shift its focal point from rental car business and generate the same revenue through insurance. They are able to generate rental insurance revenue because customers like their rental car service and buy insurance for the cars they rent. Similarly, Costco cannot sell memberships if the customers don’t find what they want from the stores and Google cannot generate ad revenue if the search results are not relevant enough for customers to keep using it.

This brings us to the real thing…the success mantra to keep the cash register ringing is: focus on the reason and embrace the source. When the source and reason are the same, its a smoother ride, but when they are different, you got to make sure that you provide great reason to your customers to come to you along with maintaining attractive revenue generating additional offerings.

Contextual irrelevance for behavioral relevance

Contextual relevance for placing online advertisement has gained wide popularity due to the success of Google’s advertising programs. It does make sense in many cases. For example, if an individual is searching for a product like tennis racquet, it makes perfect sense to target that person with advertisements of online stores that sell this particular product. Similarly, when someone is emailing a friend and scheduling a time to play tennis, an advertisement selling tennis balls or racquet is effective next to this email.

But does contextual relevance make sense regardless of the situation? It is interesting to consider the relevance of contextual advertisements when you are looking for information. For example, if someone is reading a news article on Olympic games, and gets advertisements promoting to download games on mobile phone, will it attract the user? The advertisement, though contextual in the sense that it picked the word “games” to map the context, will most likely be ignored. So in such cases, why not target user with advertisements that make sense to user’s behavior or activity on Internet?

Behavioral targeting will likely get more traction as compared to contextual  targeting in such situations. If a person searched for tennis racquets a few minutes back and then switched on to read some news articles, it will be more effective if this person gets advertisements for stores selling tennis racquet next to the news article. Though this ad will be irrelevant to the context of the news, it will still be relevant to the customer based on the behavior or activity they performed on the web around that time-frame.

Behavioral targeting based on the interest, location and activities of customers can be really effective, sometimes even more than contextual targeting. But the idea here is not to take behavioral targeting and put it in place of contextual targeting. The smart way to go about is to take it and make it supplemental to contextual targeting. In our example, if a person is searching for tennis racquets, anything but an advertisement selling tennis racquets will be less effective, i.e. nothing beats contextual targeting here. But we can use this activity of the customer searching for a tennis racquet and use it at several other places where putting contextual ad does not make sense. Coupling the two together, instead of pitching one  against the other, will be a win-win for both the customers and the advertisers.

Free vs. Close-to-free

The world wide web influences cost of things. It has made lot of things people once paid for free, be it the basics like news, email and communication tools, or not so basic things like websites, storage space and office applications. The power of adware is changing the source of income for product and service providers and bringing the cost for the end customers down to as low as zero. In this world, an important pricing question arises: should the product be free or close-to-free?

Couple of things come into picture when this question is answered. What is the barrier to entry in the market for this product? If the barrier to entry is low, and the product is adware-able, the wiser strategy is to make the product free and set a customer base before competitors following the “used apple strategy” enter the market. This is much better than charging for the product initially and then driving the cost down to zero when competitive products come into picture.

Versioning plays a role. A good strategy is to provide the basic set of services that are easily adware-able for free and charge the customer for the high-end services, the ones with a smaller set of targeted customers or the ones which will look attractive to the customers after they start using the basic set of services and familiarize themselves with the product.

Whether the price is set to zero or close-to-zero, the seller should do one very important thing: communicate the reasoning behind that to the customers, or in other words, communicate the source of income to the customers. If you are providing something for free, it’s important to explain the customers how you plan to monetize it. This makes it easier for customer to adopt your service and believe that there are no hidden fees. The most rediculous strategy is to keep something free, but take the customers’ credit card for records. Even with good intentions, this challenges the customers’ trust on the company.

Similarly if you are charging for something, justify it. Explain the customer why your product or service is worth paying for, and make it attractive enough for customers to accept it with that price tag. If something is on the web and is not free, you got to explain why, because if it is on the web, the customer expects it to be free, at least partially if not entirely.

How many vs. Who

Global advertising is a more than $600 billion industry that is growing year-over-year. This endorses the fact that in today’s competitive environment, the value of customer connection is more than ever before. Companies go to great lengths to make sure they connect with their customers, be it using old mediums like television and newspapers or new mediums like blogs and newsgroups. Television, radio, newspapers and other mediums sell their ad spaces based on how many people will watch that particular advertisement, and most of the time, more the eyeballs, more expensive is the advertisement space.

But does it really matter how many people watch your advertisement? Of course it does, if you are selling bottled water, because that’s one of the few cases where all the people watching the advertisement are your customers. But in nine out of ten cases, the marketers need to target the niche. In that case, it doesn’t matter how many people watch the advertisement, what matters is how many potential customers are watching it. The success of web search powered advertisements is a testament of the importance of relevance. If the advertisement reaches the right customer at the right time, it can have a real impact on the sales of the company.

To sum up, it doesn’t matter if your advertisement reach out to a million people if your potential customers in that million is a hundred. A much better strategy will be to first identify those hundred customers using customer intelligence and then tailor your campaign to reach those hundred customers with a clear and focused message. It’s the who that matter, not the how many.