Contextual relevance for placing online advertisement has gained wide popularity due to the success of Google’s advertising programs. It does make sense in many cases. For example, if an individual is searching for a product like tennis racquet, it makes perfect sense to target that person with advertisements of online stores that sell this particular product. Similarly, when someone is emailing a friend and scheduling a time to play tennis, an advertisement selling tennis balls or racquet is effective next to this email.
But does contextual relevance make sense regardless of the situation? It is interesting to consider the relevance of contextual advertisements when you are looking for information. For example, if someone is reading a news article on Olympic games, and gets advertisements promoting to download games on mobile phone, will it attract the user? The advertisement, though contextual in the sense that it picked the word “games” to map the context, will most likely be ignored. So in such cases, why not target user with advertisements that make sense to user’s behavior or activity on Internet?
Behavioral targeting will likely get more traction as compared to contextual targeting in such situations. If a person searched for tennis racquets a few minutes back and then switched on to read some news articles, it will be more effective if this person gets advertisements for stores selling tennis racquet next to the news article. Though this ad will be irrelevant to the context of the news, it will still be relevant to the customer based on the behavior or activity they performed on the web around that time-frame.
Behavioral targeting based on the interest, location and activities of customers can be really effective, sometimes even more than contextual targeting. But the idea here is not to take behavioral targeting and put it in place of contextual targeting. The smart way to go about is to take it and make it supplemental to contextual targeting. In our example, if a person is searching for tennis racquets, anything but an advertisement selling tennis racquets will be less effective, i.e. nothing beats contextual targeting here. But we can use this activity of the customer searching for a tennis racquet and use it at several other places where putting contextual ad does not make sense. Coupling the two together, instead of pitching one against the other, will be a win-win for both the customers and the advertisers.
Adscovery 
mobile advertisements has certainly taken a new dimension..the advertisers focus is no longer only bounded to the the design or features of the phone. They are now focusing more towards creativity..as it the creativity of the ads which are driving people to but them..virgin mobile is one of the examples i just checked their cool ads http://www.virginmobile.in/thinkhatke/ what do you think?
That’s an interesting note. In this post, I was specifically talking about Internet advertising, but here you brought a really good point as far as contextual irrelevance is concerned.
Just to add a bit more “context” to this, the contextual irrelevance the post talks about is the irrelevance between what a web page talks about and the advertisement displayed on the web page. The contextual irrelevance you are talking about is the irrelevance between content of advertisement and the product it is trying to promote.
Contextual irrelevance in advertisements on traditional medium is a good way to attract customers. I think the basic reason for creating contextual irrelevance in advertisements on mediums like television is to make audience watch the advertisement, initially to find out what the advertisement is all about, and later to see what new irrelevant theme the product has chosen this time around. Or in short, this is a great way to pull the audience’s attention towards the advertisement and hence the product. They are definitely creative and add a lot of cool factor to the product, ultimately making people to think about buying the product.
Pingback: Targeted Marketing: When and Where « Adscovery