Membership fee ballgame

Warehouse store organizations like Costco and Sam’s club run their stores on a business model where they restrict entry to the stores to members only. Members (for those you don’t know) are the people who pay an upfront membership fee ($50 a year at Costco) to get a permit to buy products in bulk from their stores. How does this work?

Before we talk about how this ballgame is played by the warehouse stores, let’s take a look at some quick facts. First, Costco and the likes have more than 70% of operating income from the membership fees. Second, due to the upfront membership fees, these stored have very less long term debts. Third, the warehouse stores, which sell in bulk packs have significantly less choices for their customers as compared to other stores like Krogers and Walmart.

So how do customers fall in this trap of paying upfront for shopping and living with less than normal number of options? While shopping at these stores, the customers find things cheaper than at other places. There are few main reasons for cheaper products, or this perception of customers. First – bulk packs. By selling everything in bulk, the product manufactures save on packaging costs to some extent and that makes these goods cheaper as compared to individual selling cost at other stores. Second – in-house branding. Costco, to be specific, carry lot of products under their in-house brand named Kirkland. These Kirkland branded products are normally cheaper than the same products of other brands. Costco saves on the advertising expense on its brand and pass on some of the savings to the customers. Third and the most important one that creates a perception that products are even cheaper than they really are is the membership fees. No customer takes into account the membership fee they paid upfront when they compare the price tag of products at these stores to the price tag at any other place.

Another reason a customer goes for warehouse store membership is to get a feeling of being an insider. By getting that membership card and getting access to these large stores, they feel like they are part of something like a cult, which in this case is a really big group. This also creates a repeat customer footfall like nothing else. It is observed that normally a person ends up buying more at warehouse stores as compared to what they would at a regular store. Cheaper products is definitely a reason for this, but I think that’s not the only reason. Another reason, which is not that obvious, is the urge to utilize the upfront membership fee as much as they can. People think that since they already became a member, it’s better to utilize it by buying more.

Initially this model of paying money upfront to buy an entry card to shop at a store sounded very wierd to me, but after trying it for one year at Costco and buying those Kirkland branded product for “less”, I was too much used to it and like most customers, renewed the membership.

For me, it’s still primarily a bookstore…

I have criticized the brand extension of Amazon.com for selling things unrelated to books sometime back. Since then, I have spent quite a good amount of money buying books from Amazon and the stock price of AMZN has increased 200%. So what exactly is working for the dotcom giant? In a couple of words: extensive personalization. When I as an individual go to Amazon.com, it still comes up primarily as a bookstore. Yes they do have a link to 42 product categories they sell, but the first thing I see there is a list of books related to my taste as a reader followed by a list of bestsellers, and then some seasonal stuff like in October, Halloween story books and costumes followed by anything else like promotional products.

To compare visually, this is the first thing I see when I am at Amazon.com (note that I have not securely logged in, it is based on the information stored in Amazon cookie on my machine. If I purchase something, before checkout I will have to log in to my account). And this is what any new user sees on going to Amazon.com at the same time. The two pages have remarkably different content because my landing page is personalized for me based on my shopping history and activity on Amazon stores, while the other one is for generic user. Similarly, if you look at the landing page for any other user, it will have a completely different content based on their interest.

Amazon is a standout example of how you can do brand extension in unrelated fields if you concentrate on each customer as an individual and provide them with what they are looking for. Amazon uses technology to its benefit by empowering the site with a search box right at the top to help you find what you are looking for instantaneously, and hence taking you in a whole new world where you will find Amazon.com as a completely different store. If you search for kitchen appliances, Amazon will turn itself for you as a kitchen appliances store, and same for anything else. The crown jewel of Amazon is recommendation engine. No one has got this one thing as well as Amazon did. This engine helps Amazon take individual customization to the next stage.

As for the stock price, I have a slightly different theory. With the Internet boom and bust settling down and the web becoming more ingrained in the life of the masses, the analysts have started comparing Amazon and the likes to the brick-and-mortar stores. This instantaneously gave a kick to Amazon because they can sell a lot more than any brick-and-mortar store, or many of these stores taken together, because for one, they have a global presence, and next, they don’t have to maintain shelves and window displays like the physical stores. Amazon does maintain a real state on its website, but that is customized for each individual customer.

Just compare going to Sears stores with shopping at Amazon. At Amazon, it might take you less than a minute to find what you are looking for, while at Sears, it might take you 10 minutes to reach the end of store where you will find what you are looking for. But then there are some natural advantages at Sears and other physical stores like customers can touch and feel stuff, customers go to buy one thing and finds something totally different at the store and buys it as well and so on. With the help of software, the likelihood of Amazon filling these gaps is much more than Sears filling the voids like personalization and a near infinite inventory at a physical location.

Advertising Education

It smells great! It makes your skin glow! It protects you from UV rays! yada yada yada, you got to try it out! How many times have you seen one of these soap commercials and thought that this is something I got to have? That’s the magic of effective advertising. This makes me wonder, if advertisements can make a commodity so glamorous, so attractive and so precious, how much impact it can have in making children excited about education.

Advertising should be the first step to attract students towards education today. Studying coursework is something that is becoming the last thing most folks wants to do after playing video games and spending time on facebook, among other things. This is because it looks like the least attractive thing out there. You can argue the quality of education provided at schools is more important. Of course, it is, and that is true even for a soap bar. You advertise to make people buy one, and if the quality of the product is good, they will buy it again. Same is true for education. Advertising in no way, shape or form fills in for bad quality of education. It only complements good quality education to make its “customers” give it a first shot.

Now that we are talking about advertising education, let’s look at some factors that might affect how we go about doing it. Who are the target customers in this case? The aim of advertising education is to make it interesting for the students who think they have a choice of doing something else that looks more attractive than studying. So to limit the scope of this discussion, I would say the target customer is anyone who is currently studying in school. There is large number of kids who never went to school because of some reason or the other. There are lot of issues to deal with in that case, which I would like to talk about in some future posts.

Who is the competitor? This is a little bit tricky. No one is saying your target customers not to study. So you are in a way not competing against anyone directly. But there are a whole slew of products and services out there that are competing to gain attention of a teenager. So that forms your competition. It’s the video game companies, the facebooks and the myspaces, any product that targets time of your target customer.

Who should advertise education? I think it should be clear that I am talking about advertising education, not a perticular school or a perticular school district. As far as educating teenagers is concerned, there can be no one organization or institute that can take this responsibility. Same is true for advertising it or making it attractive. So I think onus for advertising education should be shared by all the organization, institutes and the government, who wants the teenagers to stay in school and remain focused rather than dropping out and getting in trouble.

How to advertise education? That’s the million dollar question. Traditional media advertising might not work that well for advertising education. A few ideas that come to me in this space are around making the effectively use of “competition” to advertise it. The gaming companies and the social networking sites can play a major role in this effort. By creating more games that are related to education material and are equally compelling and attractive as the Halos and Project Gothams, the teenagers will be attracted towards them. Those games should have an education level on them and coolness factor of a player should be how good he or she is in playing these games. The gaming companies and others should go an extra mile to advertise these games and make them competitive enough to make teenagers want to study and excel in them. Facebook platform and the likes should have more applications that are related to education, and promote these applications just like they do photo sharing and music sharing applications to make the visitors collaborate and discuss about education.

The basic idea is to make people taking about education just like they talk about anything interesting in this world. Interest is always a more powerful motivator, much bigger than fear or force, and by effective advertising, interest and attraction can be generated towards education.

Comparative Advertising

Recently I saw online banner ads for Buy.com that said: 10% off Amazon.com on over 900,000 books. This made me wonder why the banner is not saying: get books for 10% less than at any online bookstore. By referring to Amazon.com in their advertisement, Buy.com is doing two major mistakes. First, they are doing some free advertisement for Amazon.com and acknowledging it as the leading bookstore online. Second, it is loosing its own identity as a bookstore. What is the unique reason someone should go to Buy.com? Because it has 900,000 books (which may not cover the entire long tail) that are also at Amazon.com but 10% cheaper. If there were only 2 online bookstores, this ad would have made a little more sense, but when there are a zillion out there, and you want price to be your USP, why not say any online bookstore and gain an identity that we sell books at cheapest rate?

Another example that falls in this category is the commercial of Hyundai Azera, where the comparison is made to Lexus LS460. Hyundai can claim that it is a smart move to compare its model with a car far more popular and expensive, and provoke the customer to think why not buy a car more economical when it has all the same features except a fancy one. But to look at the flip side of the coin, the commercial does a huge favor for Lexus. Any customer will have a natural instinct to explore and find out what else is there is LS460 that makes it more expensive, and I can bet that a Lexus sales person will be able to point many if you ask him/her. I think the Hyundai commercial also makes a statement about the buyer of this car. Isn’t it saying that this person is driving an Azera because he could not (or may be would not) afford a Lexus LS460?

Many companies use this kind of advertising strategy where they explicitly mention the name of a competitor in their advertisements. I think just by comparing, the brand exposes a natural inferiority about its own product. But, if for some reason, you find a necessity to compare on a mass scale like in an advertisement, it’s always better to generalize the comparison without naming any other company.

One thing to make clear is that finger-pointing comparison has nothing to do with modestly acknowledging that you are not at the number one position. There are far better ways to do that. The first example that comes to mind is Avis. The car rental company so wonderfully campaigned saying: we are number 2: so we try harder. Yes, they are comparing here, but no one knows just from this statement with whom. And as Avis gained market share, they kicked out the “we are number 2” part, making its tagline “We try harder”.

To summarize, we all know that comparison is inevitable, and in most cases, customer will do the comparison before making a buying decision. If as a brand you want to force the comparison, do it in a way that it benefits more to you than to your competitors and make sure there is no chance of backfiring.

Positive vibe makes all the difference

Have you ever been at a place where you feel an overflow of positive energy? Some place where you feel excited, happy and energized? What is your reaction to that? Most of the time, you enjoy that experience, and depending on what it is, you may want to have a repeat experience of it. That’s what a positive vibe is and in a World where a customer is exposed to a lot of options, it is something that can make all the difference.

Positive vibe is one of the biggest differentiators. It makes a difference in a lot of things from a simple television advertisement spot to grocery shopping to workplace environment to almost anything you can think about. In case of advertisements, positive vibe plays a role in generating a desire to have the product. The best examples that come to my mind are the Porsche commercial (long version) or the iPhone ad. These advertisements make you chuckle. Why? Because the advertisement creates a good feeling about the product. A thought that says, may be (in case of Porsche, “one day”;-)) I should buy this product. That’s a unique feeling that makes the commercial stand out because you don’t get the same feeling while watching the other dozen car and cell phone commercials. 

Another explicit case where positive vibe directly converts in dollars is shopping centers. Whether it is grocery shopping or shopping for a furniture, the positive vibe makes the customer feel comfortable to spend more time and money at the store. Some examples that pop into mind while thinking about the happy and energized atmosphere at shopping places are Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods. These stores make the customer feel at home while shopping. The staff exemplifies a feeling of happiness increasing the footfall in these stores and the number of return customers.

There are places where positive vibe doesn’t make a that straight forward difference, but it can still be instrumental in many ways. For example, consider schools. Schools are there to provide education to the students. If schools can develop a positive vibe, the learning experience can become even better for students. Students should not feel going to school as a burden or necessity. They should rather be thrilled and excited to be at school. In order to do that, the students should feel welcome, energized and happy at the school. This will encourage students to spend more time and energy at what they do at school. This will improve their preformance of what they do, irrespective of whether it is learning math and science, or excelling in sports.

The vibe does make a difference. Sometimes big, sometimes small. This makes me wonder why are there shops where it is not there. Why are there ads that don’t make you excited about a product or an online store where you don’t feel like buying something? This raises the obvious question: is positive vibe something can be created? Yes, I think it can be. In fact it should be. It should be in your list of required features you want to be there. At the end, it’s all about creativity. If you can pump in some creativity in order to make the place or product more attractive, with the explicit thought in mind to bring in the feel good factor, you can generate this critical differentiating factor.

Chasm and the Tipping Point

Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey Moore and The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell are two extraordinary books focusing on the concept of how something can be taken from a few early adopters to have an epidemic effect and reach the late majority. Crossing the Chasm explains how to market and sell high-tech products to mainstream customers. In the Tipping Point, Gladwell examines the epidemics occurring around us. Both books are great reads in themselves, but they somewhere touch on one common thing in the World of marketing that I think is worth talking about. That common thing is how any product or service, or a trend or a concept, that starts with a few individuals takes off and becomes widely accepted. In other words, how and when something becomes a mainstream phenomenon.

The thing that fascinates me the most is how this simple concept of mainstream adoption can be explained in two completely different yet related ways using the viewpoints of these two experts. To dive deeper in the comparison, let us analyze one of the most successful mainstream product (or you can call trend or fashion) adoption of the recent times: the iPod. The design genius of this product apart, let’s see how Apple marketed iPod to become a mainstream phenomenon.

Apple introduced iPod to its loyal customer base of Macintosh users (remember the days when iPod only worked with Mac!) The early adopters eagerly adopted iPod to envy of every PC user. How did iPod cross the chasm? The product supporters and specialists played a vital role in increasing the popularity of the music player making it more interesting and wannable for the pragmatists. Apple came out with the whole product which included the iTunes software to work on PC and Mac, and a set of dozens of accessories, count of which increased exponentially with a whole industry revolving around the iPod. This positioned iPod perfectly for the mass market adoption hence making it a mainstream phenomenon. 

Let’s see how, when and what “tipped” the iPod. I think the three things that were instrumental in tipping the iPod were the trendy appeal of the product, the passionate drive of the mavens and the consecutive releases of the iPod targeting the right customer at the right time. When Apple came out with this sleek, all white music player, it instantly became the fashion symbol of the cool kids. Those white earphones defined the social status of the college students hopping between classes and the health conscious folks running in the parks. These people, who paid the premium to get this expensive device, played the role of mavens for Apple best to their capacity. And to help further, Apple attracted the right customer at the right time by coming out with a version of iPod ranging from $100 to $400 for every type of customer. All this together helped the iPod tip by the 2004 holiday season.

Both outlooks, the one by Geoffrey Moore and the one by Malcolm Gladwell, are adept in describing, or teaching, how a product reaches mass adoption. Where do they meet? To put it in very simple words, I think we can define the tipping point as the point where the chasm ends. It is that inflection point from where the mainstream adoption starts. To think tipping point as that magical moment when a trend crosses a threshold, tips and spreads like wildfire makes perfect sense when you look back at all the efforts put by the parent company to create a support ecosystem, and acknowledge the early adopters, the mavens, the connectors and the salesmen who put the right efforts, knowingly or unknowingly, pushing the trend across the chasm.

The empowered mavens

Malcolm Gladwell has emphasized the importance of connectors, mavens and salesmen very clearly in The Tipping Point. Mavens, the people who are experts on a subject matter, play a critical role in success or failure of a product. They are different from paid consultants, because they pass on their advice not for money or business, but for the love of it. They are the product enthusiasts, the people who are willing to shell out a premium to be the first ones to use a product. This zeal of these seemingly weird people adds a greater credibility to whatever they have to say.

Mavens are the people who kick start the word of mouth epidemic. They are the ones on whom their friends or neighbors or coworkers rely to get expert advice. But in this connected World, mavens have become a more powerful force than ever before. They have got new weapons in the form of blogs and newsgroups to spread the word and extend their reach. They have the channels to start and spread the epidemic faster. So quite obviously, the companies need to find and embrace the mavens, more than ever before.

The accent of information age has made one thing easier for the companies, that is, finding the mavens. The companies can set their maven traps on the web and locate the mavens. Mavens on the web are the early adopters, the beta participants, the feedback providers and the newsgroup contributors. Though locating mavens on the web in no way, shape or form should substitute the much more outreaching maven traps, but it makes it easier for the companies to communicate to the mavens, listen to them and give credibility to them.

Now let’s talk about embracing the mavens. If there is only one thing a marketing organization can do right for launching a product, it should be this. The most important task for any marketing organization is to connect to the customers. And who are better people to connect to than the mavens? Every company should welcome the feedback given by these product enthusiasts, and more important than that, make sure they know that their feedback is being noted and taken seriously. How you can embrace the mavens in the Internet age? Share the spotlight with them. Thank them publicly in newsgroups or blogs for their advice. When they reply to someone else’s query, back them up as if they are part of your company.

Mavens can sometimes be a big pain to deal with. But remember, it’s not the 0.1 percent of your customer base that makes a lot of noise, it’s the 0.1 percent of your customer base that can make or break the remaining 99.9 percent of your market. There are lots of examples where the mavens have shifted the dynamics of the market. They have the unique capacity of making or breaking a brand. If a company handles the mavens in their industry with care, they can add a virtual sales force to their marketing team which is unmatched to anything else in the World! 

Why are Elephants going Guerilla?

Guerilla Marketing, the unconventional way of performing promotional activities, has long been used by small businesses to market their products (and services). But recently, more and more big companies are resorting to this tactic for marketing and advertising their products. This new trend of big companies being attracted towards Guerilla marketing highlights some issues of concern with traditional advertising mediums and some major benefits of Guerilla marketing.

I think the stickiness factor of advertising is one of the most important reasons why companies are looking for alternative ways of product promotion. Due to the developments in information technology, the mediums to which a customer is exposed to has risen dramatically. On an average, a typical individual has access to more than 50 television channels and a dozen radio stations. Along with this there are tens of magazines coming out every month and millions of websites on Internet. This has risen the number of advertisments the customer is exposed to, reducing drastically the stickiness of the messages. Guerilla marketing may look like a rescue for advertisers to attract the customers, or even a boon if the size of budget involved in the effort is comparitively small.

I think budget, though a very big factor, doesn’t seem to be the only factor. Companies with hundreds of millions in marketing budget are also resorting to Guerilla marketing efforts. Guerilla maketing is pulling companies towards itself because it is one of the most targeted way of marketing products. Take for example Red Bull, the highly caffeinated energy drink. Red Bull is one of the companies with the most unconventional advertising strategies in the World. Some Guerilla efforts that made Red Bull the most popular sports drink in the World are organizing extreme events from cliff diving in Hawaii to skateboarding in San Fransisco to support atheletes who compete in these sports and attract a very targeted customer base. Red Bull also conduct a slew of not so typical promotional activities to make it a staple at hip bars around the World including creating student brand managers and consumer educators (read more about Red Bull marketing in Sep 2001 issue of Fast Company)

Another important advantage of some of the bigger Guerilla marketing efforts is the free media attension earned by the companies. Guerilla marketing does miracles in creating a buzz and start people talking about the brand. Consider the KFC campaign to become the first logo visible from outer space right when online firms were investing millions in publishing arial images of the earth. The campaign created more buzz for KFC than any other promotional activity for any fast food company. This also clears a misconception that all Guerilla marketing efforts you see out there are on small budgets. It took more than 50 engineers, designers, architects and other professionals working nearly 3 months round the clock to create the World’s largest logo.

Talking more about the budget, Guerilla marketing normally has the advantage of smaller budget than running campaigns on traditional mediums. One of the more recent successes of Guerilla merketing is the launch of Mini by BMW in the US for a budget of about $13 million. How did BMW pull this successfully in a country where every third advertisement on any conventional advertising medium is of a car? By deploying some great Guerilla marketing tactics.

Guerilla marketing broadens, or we can say removes, the limits of creativity in the space of marketing and advertising. Companies irrespective of their size, products and marketing budgets can use Guerilla marketing to promote their products. And when elephants dance well to the tunes of Guerilla, it readily attracts the customers’ attension and keeps the cash register ringing!

Online Advertisement Immunity

Online advertising is the biggest revenue generator in the Internet business. Google struck gold with its contexual advertising model and led to a whole slew of companies to enter this fascinating World of online advertising or in Malcolm Gladwell‘s words, led to an online advertising epedemic. But is this epedemic here to stay (or expand further) or is it reaching a point where people are getting ready to develop immunity to the advertisements alongside the information they are looking for on the Internet?

The online advertising business is revolutionary. But this is not the first time something like this has happened. Every once in a while a new medium of information broadcasting comes along and marketers look for ways to use it by putting a part of the trillion dollar advertising budget on to it. For example with the advent of telephones, marketers jumped on to use tele-marketing as a source of selling products. Same thing happened as fax machines took on the mainstream and when people started using emails to interact with each other. But gradually, people became more adapt to these technologies and developed an immunity to these sales calls. They started to ignore, if not hate, most of the marketing messages on these mediums.

Where does online advertising stand? To analyse this, it is very important to understand the different types or classifications of online advertising. It will be a big mistake to generalize the customer immunity to online advertising as a whole. We can classify online advertisment budget in a couple of broad ways.

First type of classification is based on how the advertisers pay for the advertisements. Based on this, there are two main categories of advertisements – click based advertisement model, where the advertisers pay per click on their text ads, and impression based advertisement model, where the advertisers pay per visual impression of their advertisements on the website. If we look into the immunity of the audience to these two types of ads, I think impression based advertising has an edge. As the Internet users get more adapt to using the online resources, they are less likely to click on the advertising links in general. The audience are more likely to be attracted to the relevant information they are looking for on the Internet. But on the other hand, for visual impression of advertisements, audiance are more likely to glance at them while on the website.

Another way of classifying online ads is based on where they appear. Based on this premise, advertisements can be classified into two broad groups. First, the ads that appear next to search results. These ads are mostly click based contextual text ads which appear next to the search results. Google, Live and others do a good job of clearly marking the advertisements as sponsored links. This broad group can be further classified in two parts – ads next to product searches and ads next to information searches. Analysing this group, it is somewhat obvious that audiance are going to develop a high immunity to the advertisements next to the information searches. Reason being, when they are looking for certain information, they would tend to go for the search result that is closest to their request rather than on some sponsored link. On the other hand, in case of product search or local search, where people are looking for a certain product or service, they are more likely to click a sponsored link because that is some page where they will find the product. In this case, it also makes sense for the customer to click the sponsored link because these advertisers are trying to attract the customers to buy the same stuff they are looking for.

Second type of advertisements based on their location are the contextual ones that appear next to the information on the web. Advertisements on these websites largely depends on the context of the website. If the context of the website is like an online mall where people are looking to buy products (like eBay or Amazon.com), the customers will be less immune to the ads. On the other hand, if the context of the website is more informative like news, the immunity to the advertisements will be comparitively higher.

This gives us a general understanding of how more web savvy customers would react to different advertisements. Based on this, more informative decisions can be made on what kind of advertisements should be displayed at what destinations. For instance, if a customer is doing a product search, or is on an online shop, it is better for the advertisers to display click based contextual text ads. While on the other hand, if the customer is searching for some information, or watching some video or surfing some news site, visual impression based advertising should be the prefered model.

I think immunity is something that is prone to be developed for Internet advertising. But to tackle it, the ad placement need to be done in a smarter ways. Like any other epedemic, in order to let this epedemic grow and spread, there need to be ways to counter the immunity towards it, and with lessons from the history and endless supply of monetary muscles from the ad based revenues, it doesn’t seem to be an unattainable task.

Purpose-driven Branding

As the competition in a market increases, the challenge of attaining and retaining customers for a company in that market increases as well. Customers quite rightly believe, until they are shown otherwise, that hidden motive of any brand is to sell something. This reduces their affinity towards a brand, and with the growing number of options available in the market, it is easier than ever for a brand to loose customers to competition. But if the brand is able to prove to the customers that its profit making is only a by-product of a larger purpose, it gains affection of the customers making it harder for the competition to break this customer-brand bonding. This concept of branding, where a company works towards a larger purpose considering profit-making to be a by-product, is known as purpose-driven branding.

Now let’s look into how this purpose-driven branding works. Each company has a mission which gives it the direction in the long run. Any company that is successful has a very clear mission statement. The company founders and leaders have a vision which is the primary driver for attaining that mission. Some brands have a mission that is more than just selling something or being a market leader in some area. This “larger purpose” mission is something that, knowingly or unknowingly, sets the brand on this incredible path of purpose-driven branding, making success a definite “by-result”.

The first brand that comes to mind while talking about purpose-driven branding is Whole Foods. Whole Foods clearly states that its a company that works towards setting the standards of excellence for food retailers. You visit a Whole Foods store and you get a vibe that this is not a place where making profits is the primary objective (even though the items at Whole Foods are more expensive than those at a Krogers or Safeways). Whole Foods creates an affinity with its customers by making them realize that its primary objective is not to sell them groceries, but to work towards a larger goal of providing them with better stuff, stuff that is good for them and is also good for the environment. You hear Whole Foods founder John Mackey talk, or read the company blog, and you will certainly get a feeling that this company is doing more than just making profits, placing it right at the top of the list for Purpose-driven brands.

Another brand that is able to do purpose-driven branding successfully is Google. Google made its customers believe that its primary objective is not to make profits but just to organize the World’s information and make it universally accessible. Google does not alter its search results to push up sponsored pages and marks sponsored links clearly to prove that they are sticking to their mission. This has won the brand great customer affinity in a market where barrier to entry is almost negligible.

A not so typical example of purpose-driven branding is Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. It’s a brand driven by volunteers who maintain the most up-to-date information repository in the World. It’s not so typical, because making profits is not even a by-product over here. Another purpose-driven brand to watch for in the future is Wikia, which is founded by Jimmy Wales (the founder of Wikipedia), and has profit making as a by-product.

Purpose-driven branding is not something that can be easily faked by the brand managers. Brands should really keep themselves away from posing as if they are working towards a larger purpose to attract customers. Customers are too smart to identify a poser and such tactics can lead to permanently damaging the image of the brand. The drive towards the larger purpose should be there in the roots of the brand. It should be something that the customers are able to sense, not something they are to be told explicitly. Authenticity is very essential for the success of purpose-driven branding, and if a brand gets that right, it develops the muscles to even take on competitors with far deeper pockets than theirs.