Starbucks

I will end the strategy series with Starbucks.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based solely on the strategy discussion in Jack Welch’s Winning.

You enter a typical Starbucks and what do you see? Bunch of people sitting with their coffee cups reading, working on their laptops or talking (usually) softly, soothing jazz music playing in the background and baristas standing at the counter ready to take your order and prepare a fresh cup of coffee. One might argue why people pay the premium on each cup of coffee they buy at Starbucks. Apart from the great tasting coffee, the answer lies primarily in this atmosphere that Starbucks creates at its stores.

This links directly to the strategy of Starbucks: making the local Starbucks as the third place for the people in the community after their home and work. How is this atmosphere created? By providing friendly service, likable music and of course, great coffee.

In the recent years, Starbucks is facing growing competition from the like of McDonald’s, and the interesting thing to note is that McDonald’s is taking potshots at this very strategy of Starbucks in its advertisements. To counter the initial competition, Starbucks still maintained the same “third place” atmosphere and complemented it with serving simple breakfast and lunch options at its stores. This fit pretty well in its basic strategy. Next they started the $1 cup of coffee, which added an economical option to its premium-priced beverage lineup, but still maintained the atmosphere. It will be interesting to see how Starbucks will further reallocate resources to take on growing competition from the fast food chains.

Dell and Apple

Here’s another installment of the strategy series: Dell and Apple.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based solely on the strategy discussion in Jack Welch’s Winning.

Two companies that are pioneers in selling computers and other electronic items in the world have completely opposite strategies. Dell, with its online store and customization engine, makes buying a computer all about how much memory, hard disk and USB slots you need on your computer. Apple on the other hand sells you much more than a computer or personal music system iPod. It sells an experience primarily through those wonderfully designed Apple stores. Unlike Dell, Apple provides customer with more pre-customized boxed options as compared to customizing that box (Apple computers are customizable as well at Apple.com).

If we look at Dell’s model of selling computers, what Dell is doing is selling an assembled box of all the different parts that makes a computer. Customize-ability of the computer plays a big role and design takes a back seat. The distinguishing factor is pretty much the price and support. Dell’s strategy, in simple words, is to commoditize the computers. Make buying computers as simple as buying any other home or office supplies. The strategy works great with corporate customers who care more about price and support.

Apple does not sell computers, it sells an experience, a membership to an exclusive cult and an entry to the Apple product ecosystem. Design plays the central role in all Apple products. Apple’s strategy, opposite to Dell, can be stated in simple words as de-commoditization of all the products it sells. As in any typical case of de-commoditization, price takes a back seat and customers get attracted to the product itself. Apple’s strategy is crisp and clear, and Apple implements it with perfection in any industry it enters, be it the computer industry, music industry or mobile phone industry.

These are two companies selling the same things with completely different strategies and execution plans. The debate will go on for ever on which company has a better strategy, but the success of Dell and Apple asserts the point that there’s no one strategy that is good or bad for your company. Your success depends on how crisp the strategy is and how well you are implementing it.

Trader Joe’s

Here’s the next installment of the strategy series (based on the strategy chapter in Jack Welch’s Winning): Trader Joe’s.

Trader Joe’s tagline: Your Neighborhood Grocery Store. And if you visit one of these stores you will definitely get the feel of visiting a neighborhood store with an old-fashioned bell to call for help at the counters, wooden shelves, fresh bread and friendly staff. Another distinctive thing about Trader Joe’s is that, along with the regular products, you get a range of “unique” products including international frozen food, gourmet food and a different selection of wine and beer.

Trader Joe’s strategy, which seems to be ingrained in every part of the company, is very simple: provide a local feel and complement it with a unique selection of products. This is the winning strategy for the grocery chain with more than 300 stores and $6.5 billion in revenue.

This strategy provides Trader Joe’s a way to differentiate itself in the industry. Trader Joe’s distinguishes itself from other local stores by having a unique selection of products, and from competitors like Whole Foods, that carry similar products, by using its local store atmosphere.

Thai Tom

Here’s the first installment of the strategy series: Thai Tom.

Walk by the University Way in Seattle during lunch or dinner hours and it will be really hard to miss a good number of foodies waiting outside a small and dark Thai food joint while the other places have good number of tables empty. That small shabby restaurant with a few tables, an open kitchen and a bunch of counter seats is Thai Tom. Maximum capacity: about 25. Minimum wait time: 25-30 minutes. The normal procedure at this place is to put you on waitlist and ask you to wait outside. 10 minutes later, hand you a wooden slate with menu on it. Another 10 minutes and your order is taken (still on the street outside). Then eventually you get a seat in.  People from all around come to this place to have what is arguably (and voted for last three years as) the best Thai food in the city. 

Thai Tom’s strategy is clear and crisp: focus on the product. Thai Tom with its cook and three member service crew probably never had a strategy review, but knowingly or unknowingly, formed a perfect strategy: serve the best Thai food in city. Every time I go there, I hear people arguing that if the capacity of this place is doubled, it will still be full all the time. But Thai Tom sticks to its strategy by having just one cook who knows how to cook the dishes with excellence.

How can competition take on Thai Tom? Provide differentiation by excelling where Thai Tom is weak, i.e. focus on service and ambiance of restaurant while serving the best possible food. It is very unlikely that Thai Tom customers will like a competing joint on University Way just for quality of the food, but by having a strategy that focuses on zero wait time, comfortable seating and likable ambiance, they will win some customers who are either in a rush or are not interested to wait outdoors in Seattle rain!

Strategy: Let’s keep it simple

What is strategy? Jack Welch puts it so well in Winning: “Strategy is simply resource allocation. When you strip away all the noise, that’s what it comes down to. Strategy means making clear-cut choices about how to compete. You cannot be everything to everybody, no matter what the size of your business or how deep its pockets.”

I believe every successful business, small or big, has a clear and crisp strategy. Or put it in other words, to be successful, it’s better you have one for your business. Every person in a company should be on the same page when it comes to strategy, so it is critical for it to be simple.

Here, in the next few posts, I will analyze strategies for some of my favorite “brands” including a neighborhood restaurant, a grocery store, a retail giant and a couple of computer manufacturers.

You must be designers

I recently attended a meeting for product development of a technological product. There were representatives from different desciplines including program management, software development, business management and product design. Twenty people, all with their laptop open, were sitting in a conference room. Most of the participants were meeting people from other deciplines for the first time. The meeting organizer comes in the room and before the introductions could start, pointed at three folks in the room and said: “You must be designers.” “Bingo!” came the reply.

How did that person, or for that matter all others in the room, know that they were designers? They were the only ones carrying Apple macbooks in a room full of Microsoft Windows running laptops!

This is a typical case of targeting the niche, and Apple does it with ultimate perfection. Like any other niche marketing effort, Apple as well gets the pros of targeting the niche. You will hardly find any designer, artist or the likes carrying anything but a mac. Mac has a die-hard following and a strong cult continuously growing around it. At the same time there are cons to the approach. There are millions of people who do not want to be associated with this cult and go for the alternatives.

But there is something bigger going on here with respect to this cult. What do the young masses in their late teens and early twenties think about carrying a macbook? For most of them, a macbook provides everthing they need from a computer and carrying it gives them a way to join this “cool” cult. If you believe that’s the future, Apple has found a pretty good route to target the mainstream…

Why not standardize?

I recently bought a new laptop, a Lenovo T61, at work. At home, I use HP Pavilion zv5000. Thanks to software supremacy, starting to work on a new laptop is normally a pretty smooth and easy process with a negligible learning curve. But it just happened that Lenovo and HP for some reason decided to switch the places of control key and function key on their laptops, i.e. where HP decided to out the control key, Lenovo decided to put the function key and vice versa. Along with that, the two keyboards have different placement of almost all keys other than the letters and numbers on the QWERTY keyboard. These different placement of keys on the keyboard has made working on these two laptops considerably frustrating.

There must be some really good reason for these companies to design their laptop keyboards and key placements as they did. Each one of them must have spent in millions to research and develop the best possible key placement. The important thing to notice is, normally we never buy a laptop because we like the key placement on the keyboard of the laptop. There are half a dozen other differentiating factors we consider before buying a laptop like price, battery life, size, weight and so on. So why not standardize this relatively unnoticed thing and make the end user’s life easier?

Interestingly, the same thing happened with me when I switched my cell phone from HTC Dash to MOTO Q. Though the frustration here was considerably less because I don’t use the keyboard that often and I made a switch rather than trying to use both everyday, but the same argument makes sense here as well (till we are not on all touch phones), why not standardize?

It’s the kind of eyeballs that matters

Consider the following hypothetical scenario:
100 people watch a sports broadcast on television. During a timeout, an advertisement appears on the screen. Out of 100, 20 people are really target audience for this advertisement. So what matters to the advertiser? The fact that the viewership of the broadcast is 100 or that the number of target audience it is reaching is 20?

It’s the kind of eyeballs that counts 9 out of 10 times (I say 9 out of 10 times, because there are one-off cases like a Superbowl ad or times square banner ad where you are just trying to build the brand recognition). That’s the secret behind the success of search advertising because here you are reaching the right kind of audience. Advertising that targets one customer at a time based on any criteria, be it mobile phone advertising targeted based on location and time of day to an individual, or advertisement next to a web email based on what conversation a person is in, or search advertising where the audience is really trying to look for something, is more effective than the mass advertising because of the same reason. The advertiser knows that every pair of eyeballs they are reaching to are the ones that matter.

How to find out which audience matter? Couple of ways: first, profile characteristics of the audience and second, activity of the audience. Linking this information to the advertisement can provide right targeting. Let’s look at a couple of examples to make more sense here. On the Internet, if you can find that I am a person living in Seattle (City from IP address: a profile characteristic) and a Jerry Seinfeld fan (I searched for Seinfeld videos: activity), an advertisement selling DVD of Seinfeld sitcom might make more sense to me. Or, on a mobile phone, if you know that I am currently in New York City (mobile signal: a profile characteristic) and texting friends to ask for dinner (text message: activity), an advertisement selling specials at a restaurants in the vicinity will be the most attractive to me.

Few to Many

Some businesses fall in the middle ground of Few vs. Many, or we can say evolve to a state which is encompassing more than one of the two rigid blocks (few and many). They start with one and develop into other. More common is the scenario where you start with a niche area targeting a few big customers and slowly the market expands and evolves into a mass market.

For example Customer Relationship Management services. It started with big corporates looking for highly customized solutions to manage their customers. The big players in this business are companies like Oracle and SAP. Slowly small and mid-size businesses started looking for CRM solutions and providers like Salesforce and Microsoft Dynamics emerged in the market.

Another example that comes to mind is stock trade. Years back stock trade was done by a few financial houses and businesses working at the stock exchange. Now there are dozens on online brokers like Etrade, Ameritrade, Scottrade etc. and any individual can participate in the market.

Internet has been a big enabler of getting the service to the many due to a couple of reasons. First, scalability. Internet has drastically reduced the scaling cost of various services. Second, customer service and support. You can use community site to support your product or service.  This is a fantastic way to provide support because then you can use the community power to improve the product as well.

The interesting thing to understand here is when the business shifts from few to many, most of the times the major players changes as well. This states that it is completely a different ballgame when it comes to serving the many as compared to few and the companies that are focused towards serving the few cannot shift gears that easily to serve the many. Few big difference: a different pricing model, a completely different way to connect to customers (physical to virtual) and adapting to different technologies.

Few vs. Many

Ten times one million equals ten million and one million times ten equals ten million (I know it’s not rocket science, but stay with me for a second). What I am getting at is comparing two scenarios: first, having a few big customers and second, having a lot of small customers. Which is the better option: having ten customers and earning $1 million from each or having one million customers and earning $10 from each?

The first scenario is where you are targeting for specific customers. This is the more common when your customers are businesses and you are selling expensive products like computing grids, plane engines etc. or services like supply chain management. The size of the customer’s order and one-on-one relationship with a customer is what matters the most in this case.

Now let’s look at a few things that play important role in this type of business. First is goodwill. You got to (literally) have really good customer relationship management in place and maintain great relationship with every customer. A successful operation in this business turns more into a consultant-client relationship than a supplier-buyer relationship. Second, word of mouth marketing. When you are serving a niche and large amounts are at stake, referrals make all the difference. Third, brand equity. This is as important as anything else. For you to be successful in this business, your customers and prospective customers should be able to recognize your brand, depend on it and vouch for it.

The second scenario is where you are targeting for volume. This is the most common type of business in the consumer marketing and the Internet world. In case of consumer marketing, you will be selling products like soaps, cellphones, cars and so on. The success of your business depends on the size of your customer base. Similarly in case of Internet, what matters is the number of customers using your search engine, reading news on your website, participating in your social network and so on. More the eyeballs, better are your prospects.

Advertising plays a crucial role in this type of business. The goal is to reach the masses and increase the number of customers using your product. Advertising your product to the right audience at the right place and the right time can make all the difference. Another important thing is the network effect. Having a network around your product can draw more customers to it. Some services like social networking sites on the Internet naturally attract customers to the same place in order to serve their basic purpose (networking). In case of other products like cellphone, the mobile operators provide incentives like free calls to others on the same network to initiate the network effect.

There are loads of success stories (and unsuccessful attempts we don’t even know of) in both scenarios. It doesn’t matter which approach you take, what matters is how well you execute on that approach. Another thing I want to point out here is goodwill, brand equity, word of mouth marketing, advertising and networking is required for any business you choose, by pointing them in specific scenarios here, I am trying to put forward what matters more where. You cannot ignore any one of these, irrespective of whether you choose to go for few or many.