A start-up with connections

What do Hulu and Orbitz have in common? These are two great companies that started with backing from super powers in an oligopolistic industry. Orbitz is an online travel agency that was started by five major airlines in 2000 to compete against Travelocity (a Sabre reservation service venture gaining dominance in the consumer travel industry) and Expedia (founded by Microsoft). Orbitz was a very timely move by the airlines to play their role in the growing online travel agencies business and an attempt to reduce the Global Distribution System (GDS) fee.

Hulu is an online video streaming company founded by Disney, NBC Universal and News Corp to compete against YouTube, iTunes and a slew of other online streaming services. This was a very sensible move on part of the networks. Online video streaming was catching up and instead of getting cannibalized by someone else, they entered the space without losing much of the focus on their core business.

It is interesting to look at the strategy adopted by these big companies (airlines and networks in case of Orbitz and Hulu respectively) in an oligopolistic industry. Why do they help start a new company to do something like this? Why not do it in-house? There are a few good reasons behind this strategy. First, cross-platform integration is very important. A customer wants a flight ticket or want to watch a television show. They care less as to which airlines (in most cases) they are flying or the television network the show is on. They tend to go to one stop shop where they can get it all. Second critical reason is that a start-up has no baggage or legacy to support. They can start fresh and focus on what’s latest and run with time. Another important thing is the coolness factor. Start-ups can do something innovative without a lot of bureaucracy. They can hire great talent and be nimble. This, irrespective of whatever a CEO sitting in an ivory tower says, is very hard for a big corporation.

Starting a new venture in oligopolistic industries has its positives and negatives for entrepreneurs. On one hand you are dependent on long-term support of your parent super powers for survival and success, but on the other hand you get a head start, security and an excellent opportunity to hedge risks. All in all, it’s great to build a start-up with connections if you can get it right!

Testimonials in the social world

Testimonials are basically “free” advertisements your customers do for you. Testimonials play a major role in helping customers make buying decisions. If your advertisements attract the customers to your door steps (or website), testimonials make them buy your product (or service). Like everything out there, the interactivity of the web and dominance of the social media impacts testimonials as well.

Social media has enabled people to talk about you and your product. It doesn’t really matter if they are coming to you and raving or complaining about something. They are already out there interacting with the people who really care the most about what they have to say. So the ideal thing for you to do is not trying to convince them to come and speak to you, but listening to them when and where they have something to tell you. Take a feed from the social platforms like Twitter and Facebook and put it on your website. That’s your testimonials in this social world.

There are a lot of advantages of using the interaction on social media as testimonials. In fact you should encourage your customers to put a word for you in the social world instead of your website. A word out there is more powerful than on your domain. It is credible, it is reaching out to the right audience and it makes your customers feel good and in control of their views. At the same time it is easier and more convenient for customers because they are already spending time on these platforms.

It is important for you as a company to make the social feed on your website credible. The best way to do this is to keep the feed unfiltered. By letting negative feedback appear alongside the positive ones will make your feed credible and hold its importance. It is not possible for everyone out there to love your product. There will be people out there who will not like your offering or even hate it. Deal with it. Reach out to those customers and try to answer their questions. That’s your opportunity to convert them in your favor and rave about your customer service.

Social interactions about your product is a double-edged sword. You got to be careful, or to put in better words, be ready to provide the best because you no longer control what people will tell about you. This is how the social media works. It is no longer a question whether you are getting affected by it or not. Your social world is forming. The real question is are you a part of it or not?

Trading privacy for personalization

Privacy is the center piece of a lot of jitters in the integrated web experience today. Whether its Google showing you contextual advertisements or Facebook Open Graph compliant sites giving you a tailored experience, you are putting your privacy on line. What’s the point? It’s to get personalization. Personalization has become a necessity in the world today. With content overflow in the world around us, the only way to stay on the top of your areas of interest and expertise is by getting a personalized experience.

There is an interesting trade-off between personalization and privacy. While on one hand privacy is important to protect your identity from the increasingly vulnerable web, personalization can make you more efficient and presentable than anything else. So the important question here is, where to draw the line? In order to define that, it is critical to understand how much personal information is needed to provide a personalized experience. There are degrees of personalization and quite expectedly, different degrees of personalization requires different levels of information invading privacy at different levels.

One of the most common forms of personalization (beyond contextual advertising) is behavioral targeting where browsing behavior of an individual is used to personalize the experience online. This is the most simple form of behavioral targeting, where the advertisers and content providers do not use any personally identifiable  information about an individual and provides contextual relevance just based on the browsing history. In this case, the privacy is marginally compromised and the degree of personalization you get can make your browsing experience very optimal.

The next step in providing deeper personalization is to integrate an individual’s profile information with the browsing behavior. You experience this kind of profile based behavioral targeting at online stores like Amazon. Amazon knows a lot about the customer’s profile which includes their shopping pattern, their wish list, their preferences and much more. Combining this information with the browsing behavior of a customer, both on the online store and elsewhere on the world wide web helps the online store provide you with personalized shopping recommendations. Another arena where this type of personalization is experienced is at social networking sites like Facebook. Facebook collects a lot of information about the customers through their profiles, their status updates, their friends, their groups and so on. It uses this information combined with the behavioral traits of the customers to provide personalized advertising and promotions. Now let’s throw privacy in the discussion. In case of personalization at these domains, the content providers are using the information the customer has explicitly provided them. In other words, the customers can control their privacy invasion by controlling the amount of information they share with these domains. The trade-off is in terms of personalization, but as far as privacy is concerned, it’s completely under control of the customer and the trade-off is very explicit.

Move it a step further and we come to personalization on the network using an individual’s behavior and their profile information available with the network creator. Think of it as expansion of the previous scenario where the single domain has now diluted to contain several websites and online properties that agree to share the profile information of the customer to provide richer personalized experience. At one end this network based targeting provides a great personalized experience to the customers but on the other hand has raised the privacy concerns more than in any other case. In the defense of the networks, they are doing nothing without taking customers’ consent, but more often than not the customers are clueless about the consent they are providing the content providers. So how can privacy issues be addressed here? I believe the best way to do this is by educating the customer about what they are doing and by explaining them what they are gaining and what’s the cost. By doing that, it will be up to every individual to decide what cost in terms of privacy they are willing to pay for gains in terms of personalization!

Application based approach to search

Search engines today are the gateway to the web. Nine out of ten times you start your journey on Internet through search engines. Search Engine Optimization is a multi-billion dollar business because people reach your website through the back door using a search engine more often than through your home page. Google’s dominance in the search engine world is unquestioned with the company controlling about 70% of the market share.

Competition brings the best in you. With Microsoft trying to catch-up in the search world, there’s going to be more innovation and excitement in this space than ever before. With Google’s dominance and control in the search market, Microsoft is trying hard to change the game with Google ready to fight in the new field. Bing, the Microsoft’s search engine, is going for an application based approach to search. The idea is that when you do a search, you don’t just find the results, pick one and get out of there, but stay there and do much more. This application based approach is now becoming more visible in both Google and Bing.

So what does this mean and where is it going? We all have seen simple applications running in search engines. A weather application to show the weather right in there, a dictionary, a stock price, match scores etc. What do these applications do? They give you the basic information right upfront and you have an option to dive in to get more detailed information. Now extend it to other things. One of the most popular ones is news. Get the news headlines before leaving the search platform and dig deeper if you want the details.

Bing and Google are competing to extend it further. Take video for example. How would you like to see a 30 second preview of the video before clicking on it, loading it and watching it? That can be done by building a video player application inside the search engine. How about shopping? Why not find reviews, compare prices and see special offers right at one place before going out and making the purchase? Books: get the abstract before going out and purchasing it. Movies: view trailer, read reviews, see show times and buy tickets at the same place. There can be an application for everything you can think of in the search engine.

There are many advantages of application based approach to search. One of the biggest advantages is a better display which in turn converts into saving time to find the right result faster. The implicit feedback loop is important for accuracy of a search engine. The more time you spend in a search engine, the more opportunity for the search engine to learn about you, what you want and improve the results and applications. There’s an obvious business advantage as well. More time spent in search engine is proportional to more opportunity to target the audience with targeted advertisements.

Google has very well set simplicity as the new black. So the biggest caveat while playing with anything in search is to make sure the simplicity is maintained. Users today are used to getting results packaged in a clean user interface and to be successful in search space, you got to make sure simplicity is not compromised.

What Palin and Obama have in common?

Disclaimer: this is a non-political post.

Over the last year, since leaving her office as the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin has crisscrossed the country, attended a few tea party events, spoken at a couple dozen gatherings, became a normal presence on Fox channel and done a book tour. What did she get out of all this? Well a hell lot of media attention and a strong base of mavens. Palin has now developed a strong base of early supporters who think she is their leader and are ready to spread the word for her.

The early support is also appearing on social media. Palin is emerging as a social media phenom. She has got 2 million “friends” on Facebook and more than 200,000 following her on Twitter. This small (1-5%) online support base is what is common between Palin and Obama. This base was critical in making Obama a contender in primaries and putting him in the Oval Office. My.BarackObama.com raised $500 million and recruited 13 million supported in 2008 Presidential race. Here are some staggering social media stats for the Obama campaign in 2007-08: 400,000 blog entries, 200,000 campaign events and 1.2 billion minutes of YouTube video view time. Today the President continues to have a strong social media presence on all platforms.

With Americans spending 23% of their online time on social media properties, Facebook reaching 500 million users and Twitter growing at a whopping 1000% year over year, the impact of social media by 2012 will be more significant than ever before. To run a successful campaign online obviously requires a great campaign management strategy, but most important thing is getting enough pot stirrers to stimulate the discussion, generate energy and maintain authenticity. Both Obama and Palin clearly got enough passionate supporters to carry them forward on the social media front making the 2012 presidency race a vibrant and real-time experience.

Kindle application + e-bookstore = Advantage Amazon

One of the hottest territories in the technology industry today is the e-books market. New readers (or multi-purpose devices with reader functionality) are getting launched in quick succession and big players are entering the fray. With heavyweights like Amazon, Apple, Barnes & Noble, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, HP and Dell competing to sell the devices that can serve the purpose of an e-book reader, it’s too early to call who will stack on the top of the lot. The first mover advantage here is arguable, but “multi-device application” advantage is certainly not.

Amazon has adapted, what we can call, a “multi-device application” strategy which can work  big time in its favor. It has decoupled the Kindle application with the Kindle hardware, i.e. the software application that you use to read the books on Kindle e-book reader is available for a slew of other platforms including Windows, iPad and Android for free. So an e-book that you buy from Amazon can be read not only on Kindle, but on virtually any device you own.

This multi-device functionality together with other value propositions of Amazon has given it a big advantage. Amazon has got the biggest collection of books in its e-bookstore. Books is their forte. Book buying experience on Amazon is second to none. They have strong customer relationship and command unparalleled trust when it comes to books. And when you can buy a book from Amazon and read it on any device, the probability is really high for customers to use their store.

Amazon enjoys advantage, something similar to what Microsoft did with its Windows operating system back in its early days. Microsoft distributed Windows openly to run with different processors and computers made by all PC makers, making it the platform of choice for application developers and the end users. Similarly Amazon is distributing books to be read on any device, no matter who’s selling the device. This will likely give the Kindle maker an edge and could make it the e-bookstore of choice for the end users. There’s one catch, Amazon better make money selling e-books.

Apple, Samsung and the Emerging Markets

The one thing that really helped Microsoft capture the personal computer market was its strategy to focus on software that goes on computers made by any computer manufacturer from IBM to Dell. That’s been the company’s strategy which has proven great for it over the years. Windows became the platform of choice for application developers due to its great reach in turn making it irreplaceable for the PC users. Apple on the other hand made really great Macs by developing both the machine and the software that goes on it. A semi-closed ecosystem with a handful of application makers (like Microsoft Office) making software for it. Apple found its niche in the cool and trendy crowd consisting of students, designers and artists.

Bring in the mobile space. The very strategy that worked against Apple in computers playing field is now proving to be its most valued asset. Apple is a company that controls end-to-end development of its mobile phone. It controls all three key elements of the phone – hardware, software and the chip component. This gives Apple an unprecedented advantage in providing integrated user experience. Apple is able to remove any friction between hardware and software. Adding the chip development expertise to this provides Apple accuracy in estimating the processor performance and map it to feature development. The out of the box experience that FaceTime delivers is one of the first examples of how vertical integration is going to do wonders for Apple.

The only other company that has all three elements of mobile phone under its control is Samsung. Samsung, the world’s largest conglomerate, has great expertise in chip development and hardware manufacturing. Samsung manufactured phones running Windows Mobile software have been around for a while, but Samsung launched its bada platform for mobile devices in late 2009 to have complete end-to-end presence in the mobile world and Samsung Wave became the first bada based phone to enter the market a few months back. All the elements coming together positions Samsung perfectly to be a challenger in providing vertically integrated experience on the mobile platform.

Now moving on to talk about the emerging markets. Mobile phone market is growing at a tremendous pace in the developing countries. India and China each have more mobile phone users than the total population of United States. If at one end a smartphone costs more than the monthly income of many people in these countries, it is a wannabe gadget for the growing middle class. While iPhone fanaticism is catching up in these countries as well, no one can dispute the unparalleled hold Samsung’s got in the Asian markets. Samsung has one of the most efficient marketing machinery and brand presence in the electronics market out there. This positions it strongly against Apple et al to get smartphone market share in these countries.

There’s still a while to go before calling out the winner in the mobile devices world. Apple, with its genius design and development of iPhone and iPad, has captivated the imagination of everyone from consumers to competition. But it will be interesting to see how Samsung and others fare in there in the coming years and what role the emerging markets will play in deciding the fate of these companies.

Recommendation engine: books and beyond

Recommendation engines are the software applications that take customers’ shopping behavior and recommends them what other products they should consider buying. Recommendation engine plays two critical roles. First, it helps in personalizing customer experience on the web and in-turn makes online shopping a better experience. Second, it helps drive revenue for online stores by making sensible and relevant product suggestions to the customers. Amazon.com, the online retail giant, has spearheaded the innovation in this space. Everything from search results to the Amazon.com home page to emails sent out to customers are personalized for every customer with relevant recommendations based on the customer’s shopping pattern.

Amazon recommendation engine does wonders for the online bookstore. It understands a customer’s reading pattern from their search and buying history and recommends the customer similar books. The engine takes into consideration the book genre, author, buying pattern of the customer, buying pattern of other customers who bought similar books and a bunch of other criteria to display relevant recommendations. Over the years, Amazon has been able to sell millions of additional books and tap into its long tail with the help of the recommendation engine.

Now let’s talk about the scenario beyond books. Over the years, Amazon has expanded its retail footprint by selling products in more than three dozen categories. It sells everything from home appliances to jewelry. As expected, Amazon has adopted the recommendation engine for its other product categories as well. In many cases like movies, video games and music the adoption was very straightforward from books. With the help of relevant recommendations, Amazon is able to provide customers with a richer shopping experience in these categories.

Though in some other cases like home appliances, cellphones and gardening products, there’s a critical difference which makes the recommendations shown to the customers irrelevant. In categories like these, the online mega-store does not take into consideration the fact that if the customer has already bought the product from them, they won’t buy it again for sometime. I experience this when I bought a vacuum cleaner from Amazon last week. Even after buying the vacuum cleaner, my Amazon.com homepage has recommendations of vacuum cleaner and I am receiving email newsletter with attractive offers on vacuum cleaners. This would have made a lot of sense if I bought a marketing book and received recommendations for other marketing books, but when translated to a vacuum cleaner, this becomes an annoying experience. How can it be made better? Maybe by considering broader area of home appliances or cleaning products for recommendations than the narrow category of vacuum cleaners.

In all, the recommendation engine is a great innovation to enhance online shopping experience. But when applied to newer territories, there are lots of opportunities to make them smarter and more efficient.

Information to knowledge

Information overflow is one of the biggest problems in the world. Today you can find a lot of information about any topic anywhere (well “almost” anywhere) instantly. There is abundance of information which has created a problem in itself i.e. how to use it without losing key data points? Companies have made fortunes by organizing, presenting and searching information.

Information abundance and availability has done great for the world. It has leveled the playing field in many ways. People can make informed decisions. You get the breaking news the same time as anyone else in the world. You can analyze the archives from years back just like anyone else. But even after having access to the same information some people can make better decisions than others. That’s because  just having information is not enough. The important thing is how can you leverage the available information?

Information can be leveraged by converting it into knowledge. Knowledge is a result derived out of the information through perception, learning and reasoning. Knowledge is precious.  It is actionable. The differentiating factor lies in how well you are able to extract the knowledge out of the information to make critical decision, how well can you apply the learning from historical scenarios to predict the future and how well you can apply analytical reasoning to reach to the optimal results.

Technology that plays a major role in organizing the information plays an equally important role in converting it into knowledge. Complex algorithms that would adapt with usage plays a critical role in knowledge generation. Another important element in this process is human input to absorb the knowledge and make decisions. The idea is to process the information and synthesize the data to derive intelligent conclusions. This is more of a cyclical than a linear process. A process where information flows in and gets processed, knowledge is extracted, decisions are made and the processing algorithm and decision-making process gets adapted based on efficacy of the results. The adapted infrastructure is used to further take information and produce knowledge.

Who’s your competitor?

How well you know your competition plays a major role in your success. But let alone knowing them, it’s not always obvious to mark the competition right. It’s like marking the target for a shooter. Even the ace shooter can’t win if she is not able to mark the target right.

Take credit card networks for example. There is Visa, Master Card, Discover and American Express. Primarily competition here is with cash and checks. These networks are in some way competing against each other as well, but their main competition is other forms of payment. If you look at all forms of payments as the whole pie, and credit (and debit) cards as a part of that pie, it makes sense for each of these companies to increase the share of cards based payment first and compete with each other next.

There are so many other examples where competition becomes clear when you look at the broader purpose your product is trying to solve. Vending machines compete against retail stores and outlets, Google adwords is primary competing against television channels and print media for ad dollars and so on.

One interesting case is to spot a competitor when the competition is not really trying to compete with you. Consider bottled water for example. Who are these bottled water manufacturers competing against? Their primary competition is free-flowing tap water. No one is marketing or selling tap water. It is free, it is always there and (in most cases) is abundant. Bottled water manufacturers want people to trust and drink water packed in a bottle more than the free-flowing tap water.

In each of the cases we discussed here, there is competition amongst competing brands in the same category, but we need to make sure we don’t lose the complete picture and miss the primary competition.

There is one special case where you are competing with a previous version of your own product. For example Office 2007 when released competed primarily against Office 2003. Same is true to a large extent in case of progressive releases of monopoly products like iPods. This makes competition more interesting because you are in a way competing against yourself. You are out doing yourself and maintaining pace against smaller competing brands.

Knowing the right competition can help you tune your marketing message accordingly, place your product in the market appropriately and do your future product development with the right target in sight.