Category Archives: Marketing

Emotions and social media based market research

Emotions play a big role in how people express themselves. In order to understand the market correctly and identify how people perceive a product, it is important to understand how people react emotionally to the product. To be a successful product it is necessary, in most cases, that people associate positive emotions to the product. To have a consumer base that is emotionally attached to the product is a prized possession for any brand.

It is really important to capture emotions in market research. In traditional market research, the research is primarily conducted using surveys and focus groups. It is really hard to capture emotions of consumers using questionnaires and surveys. The only possible way is to have open-ended questions where people might be able to express some emotions, but due to no instant interaction there, the level of expression is limited. I would argue that it is much more possible to do so in focus groups where people are in a room and are asked questions by a moderator followed by discussions. The only possible glitch in a focus group based market research is to capture the true emotions. When a person is sitting in a focus group, it is often the case that they have a set mindset of talking to a company’s representative about a product. They are conscious about what they are talking about and how the company and others in the room will perceive them based on their answers.

Now consider the case of social media based market research. In social media conversations, people use different platforms like blogs, Twitter, Facebook, forums and other networks to express themselves. They put forth their thoughts and recommendations which more often have emotions attached with them. When doing market research using social media as a data repository, we capture these emotions to understand the perception of consumers with respect to a product. Emotions are amplifiers in social media based market research. They stir the pot of conversations. They polarize the flow of discussions.

The emotions captured in market research done on social media are more truthful. The consumers are talking amongst themselves. We are not asking them questions. They express themselves how they experience something. By capturing these conversations and understanding and analyzing them and emotions attached with them, we can provide true insights on a product.

The watercooler show

Watercooler shows are the shows people talk about in a social situation. The emergence of social media has taken the phenomenon of watercooler shows to a whole new level. Social media provides people a platform to talk about the shows. Every day millions of viewers are joining the conversation on social networks and they are using Facebook, Twitter, blogs, YouTube and other platforms to share opinions and convert a normal show into a watercooler show.

What is essential for a show to become a watercooler show on social media? Apart from great show creating a captive audience, it needs a few key influencers to stir the pot on social media, to talk about the show, love it when something great happens, hate it when the things are not as they would like it to be, but irrespective of anything happening just keep participating in conversations about it.

Millions of people spending hours online on social networks and talking about these shows also leads to an interesting side effect. It creates a rich source of data to find insights about these shows. By intelligent mining and analysis of these conversations, marketers can find what key themes and characters are sticking with the audience to develop promos and advertisements for the shows, advertisers can find what demographic and psychographic segments are associating themselves with the shows to better target their products, and producers can get a sense of what is working and what is not working in their shows. Social media sets new standards for audience analysis and measurement for the shows which are much more realistic and practical as compared to traditional methods of measurement.

The evolution of social media has impacted a lot of industries. In-home entertainment industry is one of them. Every television channel wants its show to be the watercooler show with captive customers and eager advertisers. In today’s connected world, that “watercooler” is replaced by something that is much bigger, scalable and measurable.  Social media is the new watercooler!

Permission marketing in the social world

Like, follow and subscribe: three words that have redefined the permission marketing in the recent times. Permission marketing is where people give explicit permission to marketers to contact them. There’s a big shift in how people perceive marketers courtesy of the social world. A few years back getting yourself on the do not call list was a cool thing to do, today liking a page on Facebook and following a brand on Twitter is so neat.

Sounds great. Now you got permission to communicate with your customers. That’s amazing! But something is missing. What’s the problem? The biggest problem in social media is overcrowding. Stats suggest that an average active Facebook user likes two new pages every month.

So how can a marketer best leverage the permission provided by consumers in social media? The first thing marketers need to accept is that just having a large number of followers and friends on social network is not the real definition of success in this space. In fact this is just a small part of your social media campaign. That’s because of a couple of reasons. First, the probability of your consumers staying in regular touch with you is slim. The reason being out of hundreds of friends and dozens of brand that compete for attention every minute, the probability that your brand will get the attention is as close to zero as it can be. Second, 8 out of 10 conversations about your brand are happening outside of your turf. If a consumer had a good experience with your product, they write it on their wall. If they liked a movie, they tweet it normally without linking it to the movie’s Twitter account.

It is awesome that you got permission to talk to your consumers. The important thing is to make full use of it. There are a couple of ways you can do this. One is by focusing on an issue that the consumers want to learn more about. The probability that the consumer will pay attention to the issue you, the experts and others talk about is much more likely than anything else. Second, learn about your consumers. Gain insights around who they are. What they want. What’s missing. Why they are forming a certain perception. Why they like you and why they dislike you. Then use these insights to take actions that will make you reach closer to the consumers and gain the real permission to stay on top of their mind in the social world.

Put the issue at the center

Social media marketing is driven by the conversations people have with each other and with you (a brand). There are very few cases where people want to talk about a brand per se. People normally interact on an issue that is bothering them or is close to their heart. As a social media marketer, you got to understand the themes that the people are associating with your brand, with your products, and your industry and focus on that in your conversations.

For example, if you are a pharmaceutical company selling migraine drugs, you got to focus on the patients suffering from this chronic disease. As a pharma company, your focus while stirring the conversation on social media should be answering questions like how the patient can live a healthier life, what the patient should avoid eating or what kind of exercises they should do. The idea is to be the authority when it comes to migraine in the social world out there. Subtly branding these conversations or sponsoring the discussion with experts will provide you a couple of core advantages that you cannot enjoy otherwise. First, you will have a positive impression as far as pharma company in the industry selling drugs to fight migraine. Next time when the patient is consulting about which drug to take with a pharmacist or a physician, given a choice they will pick your drug over some other. Second core advantage is the mine of information that you as a pharma company will collect by being part of these conversations.  By extracting insights from these conversations you can find the core issues surrounding the disease, you can understand the selection criteria for a patient to pick a drug, you can engage with experts and get their opinion on your drug and take action on this in-depth market research information which otherwise is not available.

Put issue at the center. The same is true in many other cases. If you are selling a hybrid car, talk about how to preserve the nature and have a smaller carbon footprint. If you are in the business of detergent, stir conversations on how to better take care of those party dresses in off-seasons. The idea is to talk about what people are interested in talking about. Social media is a great platform for you to come closer to the consumer,  understand what their needs are and how you can meet them. Leverage it by being part of it and putting the consumers and their needs at the center.

Incentives for mavens in the social world

In order to understand how to incentivize mavens, it is very important to understand how they are different from your spokesperson, brand ambassador and sales person. A spokesperson, brand ambassador or sales person is someone who works for a company. It’s their job. They say awesome things about a brand or they recommend people to use a company’s product primarily because they are paid to do that. Mavens on the other hand are the trusted experts in a field who seeks to pass knowledge on to others. These are the people who are contacted by others to find information in a field they command expertise. They do it just because they want to do this and are passionate about this.

The best incentives for mavens anywhere is recognition. One of the pioneers in this field is Microsoft. A big reason behind Microsoft’s success as a platform is the big array of applications on it. The applications are developed by a community of developers. Microsoft incentivize developers using the Microsoft MVP program. Microsoft Most Valuable Professional program gives special recognition to the developers who are active in the Microsoft developers communities and forums answering questions, making suggestions and contributing to the product. Microsoft invites them special developers conferences, gives them gift coupons to buy Microsoft software and a special tag next to their name on Microsoft communities.

Another good example is Coca-Cola. As Facebook became a big deal and companies started to look at it as a marketing platform, Coca-Cola discovered that their fan page was already there. A couple of Coca-Cola fans created the Facebook fan page and actively managed it. These individuals were real soft drink mavens who vouched for Coca-cola and took the initiative to help Coca-Cola fans engage with each other. Cola-Cola recognized that and instead of taking over the fan page encouraged these people to maintain it and provided them resources to do so. Over the years, unlike many Facebook fan pages, majority of content on Coca-Cola fan page is still generated by fans.

The most important thing to recognize while dealing with mavens is that you cannot manage them. What you can do is listen to them, engage with them and appreciate them so that they have the incentive to be part of your community and be the volunteers who act as your spokesperson, brand ambassador and sales person.

Social Media insights to measure “real health” of your organization

I wrote this post for Management Innovation Exchange. It is posted at MIX.

Summary

Implement a pattern derivation system based on the conversations people in your organization have about their work life, stress level, relationship with management and co-workers and workplace environment on social media platforms. Use the pattern obtained to find “real health” of the organization and improve corporate management and organizational change management.

Problem

Corporate surveys to find out organization health often fail to capture the “real health” of the organization.

Reasons:
1) It’s done one or two times a year. Doesn’t provide the holistic picture of how things are round the year.

2) The answers very much depend on the way the questions are asked. The surveys are closed ended.

3) People are conscious about what to put in the survey and how it will be received.

Solution

1) Develop an aggregation engine to collect information from social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn etc. about what employees are talking related to their work.

2) Develop a data store to organize and keep the information anonymous. Anonymity is important to get real insights.

3) Develop a pattern recognition system. This system will mine the information and use sophisticated algorithms to find the common themes and patterns based on these conversations.

4) Implement a search methodology to search the data store and get insights and patterns on specific topics.

Practical Impact

The “real health” measurement system can have several practical impacts on the way an organization functions, implement changes and analyses impact. Some of them are:

1) Continuous and real-time availability of the health of your organization. This is the “real health” because people share information sub-consciously and more freely with their friends and family as compared to filling a survey.

2) Improved decision making related to organizational changes incorporating the information obtained through the health measurement system.

3) Better analysis of impact of organizational changes by observing specific pattern changes in the system.

Challenges

1) Challenge: Management’s urge to link information to the sources (people in the organization).
Suggestion: Do not collect personally identifiable information during aggregation of information. Not collecting the information will make the source not identifiable (guess work will still keep happening, but the system won’t provide the source).

2) Challenge: Privacy concerns of the individuals in the organization (we don’t want individuals to stop sharing information on social networks).
Suggestion: Filter the information to only collect posts that have work related topics. A smart aggregation system with filtering capability will be able to do this.

3) Challenge: Trusting the information and patterns derived from the analysis of information.
Suggestion: It can be hard for management authorities to believe the patterns are genuine and the information is not tampered. Doing a pilot on a particular organizational change can be a way to develop trust.

First Steps

1) Collect very specific work related information from a couple of social networks to derive patterns on a few key issues concerning the organization.

2) Run pilot organizational changes in the organization and analyze impact by using the system.

How Microsoft can earn mind share of the next generation tech buyers

It’s awesome, it’s cool, I love it…these were some of the common phrases students attach to a couple of Microsoft product. But to top it off, these cool, awesome and great Microsoft products are not some glamorous gadgets, but the must have software known as Microsoft Office Excel and PowerPoint!

Spending last two year at a business school campus, I saw folks carrying all kinds of cool electronic gadgets from laptops to smartphones. Some people love their Macs, others love their ThinkPads. People swear by their iPhones and Blackberrys. The funny thing is that everyone has got their reasoning to prefer one over the other, and they are of course right from their perspectives, but if there’s only one product which holds up to true (Microsoft) monopoly status, it’s Microsoft Office.

I believe Microsoft Office is the coolest product Microsoft has got in its arsenal at this time. Replacing Excel and PowerPoint is not an option for anyone anytime soon (some might defer, but I believe realistically it won’t be that easy to get rid of them). The best thing for company to do is use these products to the fullest extent to show Microsoft’s coolness to the future generation.

The point here is for the company to build up on the already proven products which people love and build an ecosystem around them. Excel and PowerPoint should be linked to every productivity tool there possibly is ranging from email to instant messenger. Microsoft should take the lead and proactively market the fully featured office collaborative tools focusing on these two products (the keywords here being “fully featured”). Not doing that is pushing people to use competitive products for collaboration.

All these technologies are already there in the expensive version of the software where you can use Office Live Communicator and SharePoint. But these are not the tools a normal college going person use on a daily basis. They use the ones which are more commonly available and can be used for both work and fun. The only way to captivate their attention is to go where they are.

Talking in terms of numbers, let’s look at the cost of acquisition and map it to the Life Time Value of the customer (very stripped down, simplistic back of the envelope calculations). Consider a business school student who’s going to be there for two years. If Microsoft gives away a fully featured version of Microsoft Office with communicator, SharePoint and what not, it will be equivalent to giving away $500 worth of software per student. Microsoft releases a new version of Office every four years. A b-school graduate will be working in the real world for about 30 years on an average. That’s about seven releases of Microsoft Office software if it keeps up the current pace. If the investment made on the customer during two years at b-school makes him or her a loyal customer, with a 40% loyalty retention, the company can expect a return of $2000 per individual for whom this customer is making a software buying decision.

Microsoft: think of it more as a customer acquisition and retention opportunity than an additional software sale opportunity…it will work because you are earning mind share of the audience that is going to make the buying decision tomorrow!

Social world ownership

Social networks have become the number one place for people to spend time. With more and more people spending time over there, it has become the place to be for businesses. The growing overcrowding on social media has made it very easy for anyone to get lost. The natural reaction here for businesses is to try and take ownership of their social worlds. But is it even possible?

Let’s first define the social world for your business. Is it your Facebook fan page and twitter handle? Or is it your microsite where you have all sort of cool games for people to learn about your products and the forum that you maintain to provide customer support? Well its all this and much more. The reason being, nine out of ten times, the communication is not happening on your turf. If people like your product, they share it with their friends in their tweets. They write about a horrible experience with your customer service on their blog. They provide recommendations and share experiences where they find it comfortable. So this defines your social world as the world out there, with no boundaries and no limits.

The point is, your social world is forming out there. It is continuously evolving. You cannot own your social world and you should not even try to do that. What you can do is be an active part of it. Stir the pot. Answer questions that the customers pose. Take feedback from your customers. Identify the mavens–passionate users and the opinion makers–and engage with them and let them be your advocates. That’s the best way you can leverage your social world.

Beating a great product

Think of a successful product and you can always find a better product out there in the market at the same time which is not successful. So what made the better product unsuccessful? In other words, what is needed for a product to be successful? I believe a great product can be beaten down by a good enough product with the help of right marketing, pricing and network.

Let’s start with marketing. Marketing can do wonders. It can make you jump higher in the same pair of shoes, it can make a bottle of soda bring back the memories of good old days and it can make the same music sound more trendy. It’s not that no one else ever had better shoes than Nike, no soft drink maker came up with a better formula than coke or no music player did a better job than the iPod. But all of these had great marketing machinery working for them. They created this mental image of a product that make you feel better while using them.

Pricing is another important point that can make a good product tear down a great one. Best example of this is the encyclopedia industry. Britannica was back in the day the gold standard in the world of encyclopedias. People put down thousands of dollars to buy the set of Britannica which took the prime spot in the bookshelves of the few who can afford it. Along came Encarta at a fraction of the price and on a DVD to disrupt the industry followed by free for all Wikipedia to beat them all. Encarta, when it came out, was not as great as Britannica was and Wikipedia in its infancy was a collection of web pages written by random people. But they were good enough. Wikipedia also had an added advantage of the strong community to bring down some great products.

This brings us to the third ingredient: network. Facebook beat classmate, friendster and a dozen others that came before it. It’s not that Facebook was so out of this world neither were the others so terrible. What worked for Facebook was the network effect which it created with the help of the exclusive membership to start with and the open platform for thousands of applications to live on it. We can see some form of direct or indirect network effect in every product’s success story from Windows to iPhone.

I am not undermining the importance of making a great product. A good product is a pre-requisite for being successful, but more often than not, good enough is the right way to go. In other words, a great product by itself is worthless if it is not backed by a great marketing and optimal pricing. And if it has some potential to build a network effect, your customers will give you ample opportunity to improve your product.

Together we all win

That in a nutshell is the strategy adopted by the establishments in Las Vegas. Fighting vigorously amongst themselves, Vegas heavyweights would have very easily carved the paths for their respective bankruptcies, but together, they have developed the power to win the world!

Interoperability in transportation, bill payments, connectivity and free movement with the same exclusivity like pool, spa etc. for the guests of the hotel, casino fraud protection and shows coordination. All these together has made a strip in the middle of nowhere the most happening and entertaining place on the earth. Guided by a mutual understanding (and keeping antitrust on the bay), the hotels at Vegas are also priced almost equally led by the star ratings.

It will be stupid to think that the establishments in Vegas don’t compete. They of course do and do it well to make sure they serve the customers well, people spend the most at their casinos and clubs and are attracted again and again to their hotels. But the competition is on the service factor and not just price point, it’s to attract their niche genre, and not everyone and it’s more often than not to out do oneself than beating down someone else.

The basic point to understand is that there are a lot of things to compete on instead of competing on price of the product or service. Similar strategic understanding can be seen when you look at a number of other industries around us like soft drink giants Coke and Pepsi (in consumer market) and mobile operators. Companies in all these industries have realized that the best way to win is by enlarging the size of the pie and letting everyone have a share of it rather than fight for a small pie and cut each others’ throat to collectively lose.